Paragraph 28 — part 2
European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026
A10-0036/2026 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – § 28/2
Adopted
- For
- 593
- Against
- 23
- Abstained
- 19
roll-call vote at 13:00 · 93% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: ‘underlines that any overall increase in the Commission’s discretionary power must be accompanied by corresponding ex post accountability mechanisms and a substantial improvement in the flow of information towards Parliament;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 41 | 1 | 1 | 43 | For |
| Greens | 47 | 0 | 0 | 47 | For |
| S&D | 120 | 0 | 0 | 120 | For |
| Renew | 68 | 1 | 0 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 162 | 2 | 0 | 164 | For |
| ECR | 75 | 0 | 2 | 77 | For |
| Patriots | 33 | 16 | 14 | 63 | Divided |
| ESN | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | For |
| No group | 22 | 3 | 2 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 635 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.