Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Every vote on this decision

European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026

27 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the , where every MEP’s position is recorded.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 12 amendments (12 rejected) and 14 parts of the text voted on separately (10 adopted, 4 rejected).

· 14

  1. Vote 1:Paragraph 9 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘, including those with energy-intensive industries’

  2. Vote 2:Paragraph 9 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted 332 for, 266 against, 34 abstained

    Split vote by EPP

    those words

  3. Vote 4:Separate vote on paragraph 12

    Adopted 304 for, 293 against, 28 abstained

  4. Vote 7:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 15

    Rejected show of hands

  5. Vote 11:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 22

    Rejected show of hands

  6. Vote 13:Separate vote on paragraph 24

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

  7. Vote 14:Paragraph 24 — part 2

    A10-0036/2026 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – § 24/2

    Adopted 444 for, 176 against, 9 abstained

    12:59

    Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots

    those words

  8. Vote 17:Separate vote on paragraph 28

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

  9. Vote 18:Paragraph 28 — part 2

    A10-0036/2026 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – § 28/2

    Adopted 593 for, 23 against, 19 abstained

    13:00

    Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘underlines that any overall increase in the Commission’s discretionary power must be accompanied by corresponding ex post accountability mechanisms and a substantial improvement in the flow of information towards Parliament;’

  10. Vote 20:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 30

    Rejected show of hands

  11. Vote 22:Paragraph 32 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP, Patriots

    The part voted on

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘notes that EU debt securities could serve as a benchmark, thereby strengthening the integration of EU financial markets;’ and ‘calls for the introduction of new own resources to finance the Union’s policies;’

  12. Vote 23:Paragraph 32 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted 266 for, 266 against, 101 abstained

    Split vote by EPP, Patriots

    ‘notes that EU debt securities could serve as a benchmark, thereby strengthening the integration of EU financial markets;’

  13. Vote 24:Paragraph 32 — part 3

    A10-0036/2026 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – § 32/3

    Adopted 383 for, 220 against, 31 abstained

    13:01

    Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by EPP, Patriots

    ‘calls for the introduction of new own resources to finance the Union’s policies;’

  14. Vote 25:Vote on text inserted after recital A

    Rejected show of hands

· 12

  1. Vote 3:Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 11

    A10-0036/2026 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – After § 11 – Am 5

    Rejected 107 for, 458 against, 65 abstained

    12:57

    Roll call requested by The Left

  2. Vote 5:Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14

    A10-0036/2026 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – After § 14 – Am 1

    Rejected 67 for, 501 against, 62 abstained

    12:58

    Roll call requested by The Left

  3. Vote 6:Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 14

    A10-0036/2026 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – After § 14 – Am 2

    Rejected 58 for, 544 against, 27 abstained

    12:58

    Roll call requested by The Left

  4. Vote 8:Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 15

    A10-0036/2026 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – After § 15 – Am 7

    Rejected 62 for, 535 against, 38 abstained

    12:58

    Roll call requested by The Left

  5. Vote 9:Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 16

    A10-0036/2026 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – After § 16 – Am 8

    Rejected 71 for, 388 against, 171 abstained

    12:59

    Roll call requested by The Left

  6. Vote 10:Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 22

    A10-0036/2026 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – After § 22 – Am 9

    Rejected 97 for, 367 against, 161 abstained

    12:59

    Roll call requested by The Left

  7. Vote 12:Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 22

    A10-0036/2026 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – After § 22 – Am 11

    Rejected 79 for, 519 against, 36 abstained

    12:59

    Roll call requested by The Left

  8. Vote 15:Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 24

    A10-0036/2026 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – After § 24 – Am 15

    Rejected 184 for, 441 against, 3 abstained

    12:59

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  9. Vote 16:Amendment 16 to paragraph 28

    A10-0036/2026 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – § 28 – Am 16

    Rejected 189 for, 415 against, 16 abstained

    13:00

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  10. Vote 19:Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 28

    A10-0036/2026 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – After § 28 – Am 17

    Rejected 183 for, 404 against, 37 abstained

    13:00

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  11. Vote 21:Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 30

    A10-0036/2026 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – After § 30 – Am 13

    Rejected 70 for, 506 against, 56 abstained

    13:00

    Roll call requested by The Left

  12. Vote 26:Amendment 4, adding text after recital 3

    A10-0036/2026 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – After recital 3 – Am 4

    Rejected 71 for, 476 against, 84 abstained

    13:01

    Roll call requested by The Left

· 1

  1. Vote 27:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote

    A10-0036/2026 – Kira Marie Peter-Hansen – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

    Adopted 392 for, 219 against, 18 abstained

    13:02

← Back to the decision