Paragraph 18 — part 1
Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies
A10-0018/2026 – André Franqueira Rodrigues – § 18/1
Adopted
- For
- 444
- Against
- 153
- Abstained
- 16
roll-call vote at 14:12 · 72% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Members · split vote by Members
The part voted on: ‘Urges the Commission to ensure that the EU’s fisheries management approaches are aligned with the CFP, the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and the EU’s international commitments such as the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 37 | 1 | 0 | 38 | For |
| Greens | 47 | 0 | 0 | 47 | For |
| S&D | 119 | 0 | 1 | 120 | For |
| Renew | 62 | 2 | 0 | 64 | For |
| EPP | 159 | 0 | 2 | 161 | For |
| ECR | 7 | 61 | 5 | 73 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 64 | 0 | 64 | Against |
| ESN | 1 | 20 | 2 | 23 | Against |
| No group | 12 | 5 | 6 | 23 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
64 MEPs of 613 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.