Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law., Agriculture, food & fisheries
Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies
Adopted by an overwhelming majority
Parliament adopted the text as its official position.
- For
- 528
- Against
- 21
- Abstained
- 62
roll-call vote at 14:13 · 86% of votes cast in favour
Committee report by André Franqueira Rodrigues · Report A-10-2026-0018
AI:What this decision does
Parliament adopted a resolution on fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive alien species, and benefiting local economies.§1: source passage in the text The text urges the Commission and member states to prioritise conservation of sensitive species through robust fisheries management and full implementation of marine protected area goals.§2: source passage in the text It calls for improved monitoring and harmonised indicators for marine invasive alien species, and for financial support for protection and early warning systems.§2: source passage in the text
Written by AI from the text voted on · counts are the official record · Read the text · Report a problem
How the groups voted
For: Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR, Patriots; Abstained: ESN; Divided: The Left
- The Left Divided 9 for, 16 against, 13 abstainedof 46
- Greens For 47 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 54
- S&D For 123 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 135
- Renew For 65 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 76
- EPP For 161 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 190
- ECR For 61 for, 2 against, 5 abstainedof 79
- Patriots For 44 for, 0 against, 19 abstainedof 86
- ESN Abstained 3 for, 1 against, 19 abstainedof 28
- No group not a group 15 for, 2 against, 6 abstainedof 31
Groups from left to right · for–against–abstained, of the group’s MEPs
A group is shown as divided when no position has two thirds of its votes.
Did not vote with their group
30 MEPs voted differently from their group’s clear line (two thirds of its votes).
ECR voted for (61 of 68). Against: 2, Abstained: 5
Beatrice Timgren (Sweden, abstained), Charlie Weimers (Sweden, abstained), Denis Nesci (Italy, against), Dick Erixon (Sweden, abstained), Marion Maréchal (France, abstained)
2 more from ECR
Nicolas Bay (France, abstained), Sebastian Tynkkynen (Finland, against)
Patriots voted for (44 of 63). Abstained: 19
Afroditi Latinopoulou (Greece), Anna Bryłka (Poland), Anna Maria Cisint (Italy), António Tânger Corrêa (Portugal), Auke Zijlstra (Netherlands)
14 more from Patriots
Isabella Tovaglieri (Italy), Jorge Buxadé Villalba (Spain), Juan Carlos Girauta Vidal (Spain), Margarita De La Pisa Carrión (Spain), Marieke Ehlers (Netherlands), Mieke Andriese (Netherlands), Mireia Borrás Pabón (Spain), Paolo Borchia (Italy), Rachel Blom (Netherlands), Raffaele Stancanelli (Italy), Silvia Sardone (Italy), Susanna Ceccardi (Italy), Tomasz Buczek (Poland), Ton Diepeveen (Netherlands)
ESN abstained (19 of 23). For: 3, Against: 1
Marcin Sypniewski (Poland, against), Tomasz Froelich (Germany, for), Volker Schnurrbusch (Germany, for), Zsuzsanna Borvendég (Hungary, for)
Groups as they are now; members who changed group are compared with their current one.
Find an MEP
Opens the list of MEPs on the vote page, filtered to the country you pick.
How it got here
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 3 amendments (1 adopted, 2 rejected) and 6 parts of the text voted on separately (4 adopted, 2 rejected).