Amendment 2 to paragraph 16
Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies
A10-0018/2026 – André Franqueira Rodrigues – § 16 – Am 2
Rejected
- For
- 247
- Against
- 334
- Abstained
- 28
roll-call vote at 14:12 · 41% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by The Left
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 36 | 0 | 0 | 36 | For |
| Greens | 47 | 0 | 0 | 47 | For |
| S&D | 58 | 59 | 0 | 117 | Divided |
| Renew | 40 | 25 | 0 | 65 | Divided |
| EPP | 29 | 128 | 6 | 163 | Against |
| ECR | 10 | 61 | 2 | 73 | Against |
| Patriots | 6 | 57 | 1 | 64 | Against |
| ESN | 3 | 2 | 16 | 21 | Abstained |
| No group | 18 | 2 | 3 | 23 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
21 MEPs of 609 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.