Recital O — part 1
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – recital O/1
Adopted
- For
- 539
- Against
- 77
- Abstained
- 5
roll-call vote at 13:58 · 87% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by The Left
The part voted on: Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas private property is threatened by illegal occupation, known as squatting, and systematic non-payment of rent phenomena, which harms communities and particularly small property owners, forcing them to exit the market and to rightfully recover their property, thereby reducing the available supply and contributing to rising prices; whereas illegally staying in a property undermines the EU Charter and constitutes a violation of the rule of law;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 37 | 0 | 0 | 37 | For |
| Greens | 1 | 46 | 0 | 47 | Against |
| S&D | 120 | 3 | 0 | 123 | For |
| Renew | 68 | 1 | 0 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 154 | 3 | 1 | 158 | For |
| ECR | 70 | 1 | 0 | 71 | For |
| Patriots | 66 | 0 | 0 | 66 | For |
| ESN | 3 | 19 | 2 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 20 | 4 | 2 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
24 MEPs of 621 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.