Recital J — part 2
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – recital J/2
Adopted
- For
- 422
- Against
- 172
- Abstained
- 25
roll-call vote at 13:57 · 68% of votes cast in favour
Split vote by ECR, Patriots
The part voted on: ‘whereas key EU legislation to achieve long-term financial stability, such as the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive and the Energy Efficiency Directive, sets technical requirements regarding sustainability, energy efficiency, and safety;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 35 | 0 | 1 | 36 | For |
| Greens | 46 | 0 | 0 | 46 | For |
| S&D | 108 | 12 | 0 | 120 | For |
| Renew | 67 | 0 | 0 | 67 | For |
| EPP | 154 | 6 | 2 | 162 | For |
| ECR | 1 | 66 | 6 | 73 | Against |
| Patriots | 6 | 52 | 8 | 66 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 21 | 2 | 23 | Against |
| No group | 5 | 15 | 6 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
36 MEPs of 619 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.