Paragraph 57 — part 1
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 57/1
Adopted
- For
- 550
- Against
- 49
- Abstained
- 20
roll-call vote at 13:54 · 89% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: Text as a whole without the words: ‘recalls that action on homelessness is primarily a competence of the Member States, while the EU should support and coordinate efforts;’ and ‘calls on the Member States to adopt national targets to prevent the eviction of children in cases where there is a clear risk of homelessness’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 38 | 0 | 0 | 38 | For |
| Greens | 46 | 0 | 0 | 46 | For |
| S&D | 121 | 1 | 0 | 122 | For |
| Renew | 66 | 3 | 0 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 158 | 2 | 0 | 160 | For |
| ECR | 60 | 6 | 6 | 72 | For |
| Patriots | 42 | 16 | 7 | 65 | Divided |
| ESN | 0 | 20 | 2 | 22 | Against |
| No group | 19 | 1 | 5 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 619 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.