Paragraph 53 — part 2
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 53/2
Adopted
- For
- 480
- Against
- 111
- Abstained
- 24
roll-call vote at 13:53 · 78% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens · split vote by Greens, ECR
The part voted on: ‘recognises that private home savings funds are a practical and effective tool for individuals and families to invest in housing and encourage greater accessibility to mortgage funding; calls on the Member States to facilitate the implementation and promotion of these measures as part of broader efforts to address the housing crisis;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 37 | 0 | 37 | Against |
| Greens | 1 | 45 | 0 | 46 | Against |
| S&D | 113 | 5 | 3 | 121 | For |
| Renew | 68 | 0 | 0 | 68 | For |
| EPP | 160 | 0 | 0 | 160 | For |
| ECR | 67 | 2 | 0 | 69 | For |
| Patriots | 57 | 4 | 5 | 66 | For |
| ESN | 4 | 14 | 5 | 23 | Divided |
| No group | 10 | 4 | 11 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 615 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.