Amendment 106 — part 2, after paragraph 50
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 50 – Am 106/2
Adopted
- For
- 323
- Against
- 247
- Abstained
- 41
roll-call vote at 13:52 · 53% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP, S&D · split vote by ECR
The part voted on: those words
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 37 | 0 | 0 | 37 | For |
| Greens | 47 | 0 | 0 | 47 | For |
| S&D | 116 | 0 | 5 | 121 | For |
| Renew | 52 | 17 | 0 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 39 | 117 | 2 | 158 | Against |
| ECR | 7 | 60 | 0 | 67 | Against |
| Patriots | 7 | 29 | 28 | 64 | Divided |
| ESN | 0 | 22 | 2 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 18 | 2 | 4 | 24 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
24 MEPs of 611 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.