Amendment 106 — part 1, after paragraph 50
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 50 – Am 106/1
Adopted
- For
- 529
- Against
- 72
- Abstained
- 19
roll-call vote at 13:52 · 85% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP, S&D · split vote by ECR
The part voted on: Text as a whole without the words: ‘reiterates, in this context, its call for a substantial dedicated budget of at least EUR 20 billion for the European Child Guarantee;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 38 | 0 | 0 | 38 | For |
| Greens | 47 | 0 | 0 | 47 | For |
| S&D | 121 | 0 | 0 | 121 | For |
| Renew | 52 | 17 | 0 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 155 | 6 | 0 | 161 | For |
| ECR | 55 | 9 | 6 | 70 | For |
| Patriots | 45 | 15 | 6 | 66 | For |
| ESN | 0 | 22 | 2 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 16 | 3 | 5 | 24 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
24 MEPs of 620 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.