Paragraph 48 — part 7
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/7
Adopted
- For
- 532
- Against
- 60
- Abstained
- 21
roll-call vote at 13:50 · 87% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, Patriots
The part voted on: ‘which could be useful in certain contexts to prevent abusive financialisation practices,’ without the words: ‘could be useful in certain contexts to’ and ‘abusive’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 38 | 0 | 0 | 38 | For |
| Greens | 46 | 0 | 0 | 46 | For |
| S&D | 121 | 0 | 0 | 121 | For |
| Renew | 63 | 4 | 0 | 67 | For |
| EPP | 154 | 3 | 0 | 157 | For |
| ECR | 59 | 5 | 6 | 70 | For |
| Patriots | 29 | 27 | 10 | 66 | Divided |
| ESN | 3 | 19 | 1 | 23 | Against |
| No group | 19 | 2 | 4 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
66 MEPs of 613 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.