Paragraph 48 — part 6
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/6
Adopted
- For
- 549
- Against
- 35
- Abstained
- 29
roll-call vote at 13:50 · 90% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, Patriots
The part voted on: ‘calls on the Member States to adopt measures to incentivise bringing vacant and derelict homes back into use, as this is essential to increasing supply, safeguarding affordability, and revitalising communities; stresses that public investment in housing should serve the public interest and deliver long-term value; welcomes public ownership models where housing remains publicly managed,’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 38 | 0 | 0 | 38 | For |
| Greens | 45 | 0 | 0 | 45 | For |
| S&D | 120 | 0 | 0 | 120 | For |
| Renew | 68 | 0 | 0 | 68 | For |
| EPP | 155 | 4 | 0 | 159 | For |
| ECR | 56 | 9 | 5 | 70 | For |
| Patriots | 48 | 0 | 16 | 64 | For |
| ESN | 0 | 20 | 4 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 19 | 2 | 4 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 613 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.