Paragraph 48 — part 4
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/4
Adopted
- For
- 485
- Against
- 106
- Abstained
- 15
roll-call vote at 13:49 · 80% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, Patriots
The part voted on: ‘and possible EU-level tools; calls on the Commission and the Member States to exchange data and best practice on combating abusive financialisation practices and speculative purchases, reducing the likelihood of destabilising local housing markets;’ without the word: ‘abusive’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 38 | 0 | 0 | 38 | For |
| Greens | 46 | 0 | 0 | 46 | For |
| S&D | 122 | 0 | 0 | 122 | For |
| Renew | 53 | 7 | 7 | 67 | For |
| EPP | 150 | 2 | 1 | 153 | For |
| ECR | 56 | 12 | 3 | 71 | For |
| Patriots | 1 | 64 | 0 | 65 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 17 | 2 | 19 | Against |
| No group | 19 | 4 | 2 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 606 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.