Paragraph 48 — part 3
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/3
Adopted
- For
- 514
- Against
- 84
- Abstained
- 17
roll-call vote at 13:49 · 84% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, Patriots
The part voted on: ‘stresses the importance of safeguarding financial stability and ensuring that financial instruments contribute to ensuring decent, sustainable and affordable housing for all; calls on the Commission and the Member States to enhance transparency in real estate transactions, including through improved data collection’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 38 | 0 | 0 | 38 | For |
| Greens | 45 | 0 | 0 | 45 | For |
| S&D | 122 | 0 | 0 | 122 | For |
| Renew | 64 | 5 | 0 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 153 | 2 | 0 | 155 | For |
| ECR | 58 | 12 | 0 | 70 | For |
| Patriots | 13 | 43 | 10 | 66 | Divided |
| ESN | 0 | 22 | 2 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 21 | 0 | 5 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
24 MEPs of 615 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.