Paragraph 45 — part 3
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 45/3
Adopted
- For
- 359
- Against
- 230
- Abstained
- 26
roll-call vote at 13:47 · 58% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Renew, ECR, Patriots
The part voted on: ‘further explore the added value of creating a European housing agency,’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 27 | 8 | 3 | 38 | For |
| Greens | 46 | 1 | 0 | 47 | For |
| S&D | 118 | 1 | 3 | 122 | For |
| Renew | 2 | 67 | 0 | 69 | Against |
| EPP | 104 | 43 | 6 | 153 | For |
| ECR | 54 | 14 | 2 | 70 | For |
| Patriots | 0 | 65 | 0 | 65 | Against |
| ESN | 1 | 23 | 1 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 7 | 8 | 11 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 615 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.