Paragraph 41 — part 6
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 41/6
Adopted
- For
- 480
- Against
- 132
- Abstained
- 11
roll-call vote at 13:44 · 77% of votes cast in favour
Split vote by Greens
The part voted on: ‘notes that market-based housing solutions remain an effective way to sustainably expand supply and highlights the importance of an investment-friendly regulatory environment in this regard;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 38 | 1 | 39 | Against |
| Greens | 5 | 41 | 1 | 47 | Against |
| S&D | 98 | 25 | 0 | 123 | For |
| Renew | 67 | 0 | 0 | 67 | For |
| EPP | 160 | 0 | 0 | 160 | For |
| ECR | 72 | 1 | 0 | 73 | For |
| Patriots | 64 | 2 | 0 | 66 | For |
| ESN | 4 | 17 | 2 | 23 | Against |
| No group | 10 | 8 | 7 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 623 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.