Paragraph 40 — part 4
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 40/4
Adopted
- For
- 542
- Against
- 43
- Abstained
- 36
roll-call vote at 13:43 · 87% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by The Left, Patriots
The part voted on: ‘considers that certain measures could help urban centres regain their residential functions, such as adequate and proportionate licensing systems, increased transparency regarding large-scale foreign property acquisitions in order to monitor housing availability, authorisations from neighbours’ associations or the main owner, or safety, quality and consumer protection standards, ensuring that those policies are proportionate and tailored to the specific circumstances; underlines that measures are needed to safeguard housing for residents and preserve the diversity and vitality of urban communities;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 37 | 0 | 0 | 37 | For |
| Greens | 47 | 0 | 0 | 47 | For |
| S&D | 122 | 0 | 0 | 122 | For |
| Renew | 67 | 0 | 2 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 157 | 0 | 3 | 160 | For |
| ECR | 64 | 4 | 5 | 73 | For |
| Patriots | 28 | 17 | 19 | 64 | Divided |
| ESN | 1 | 22 | 2 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 19 | 0 | 5 | 24 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
64 MEPs of 621 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.