Paragraph 29 — part 3
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 29/3
Adopted
- For
- 498
- Against
- 97
- Abstained
- 22
roll-call vote at 13:36 · 81% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots, EPP, S&D · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: ‘supports the role of tenants’ unions and housing civil society actors as stakeholders in housing policy;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 39 | 0 | 0 | 39 | For |
| Greens | 46 | 0 | 0 | 46 | For |
| S&D | 122 | 0 | 0 | 122 | For |
| Renew | 64 | 2 | 3 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 155 | 1 | 1 | 157 | For |
| ECR | 56 | 9 | 5 | 70 | For |
| Patriots | 0 | 59 | 5 | 64 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 24 | 1 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 16 | 2 | 7 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 617 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.