Paragraph 23 — part 1
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 23/1
Adopted
- For
- 558
- Against
- 40
- Abstained
- 22
roll-call vote at 13:33 · 90% of votes cast in favour
Split vote by Greens
The part voted on: Text as a whole without the words: ‘increasing mobility and’ and ‘any tax and’ and ‘incentives to’ and ‘housing’ and ‘market’ and ‘and market-distorting practices’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 35 | 2 | 1 | 38 | For |
| Greens | 45 | 1 | 0 | 46 | For |
| S&D | 115 | 6 | 0 | 121 | For |
| Renew | 59 | 3 | 7 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 160 | 1 | 0 | 161 | For |
| ECR | 64 | 5 | 2 | 71 | For |
| Patriots | 59 | 0 | 5 | 64 | For |
| ESN | 1 | 19 | 5 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 20 | 3 | 2 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 620 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.