Paragraph 22 — part 6
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 22/6
Adopted
- For
- 441
- Against
- 166
- Abstained
- 17
roll-call vote at 13:32 · 71% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Greens, ECR, Patriots
The part voted on: ‘be consistent with the EU’s objectives’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 35 | 0 | 2 | 37 | For |
| Greens | 45 | 1 | 0 | 46 | For |
| S&D | 120 | 1 | 0 | 121 | For |
| Renew | 69 | 0 | 0 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 157 | 3 | 2 | 162 | For |
| ECR | 3 | 66 | 4 | 73 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 61 | 4 | 65 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 12 | 9 | 5 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 624 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.