Paragraph 22 — part 4
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 22/4
Adopted
- For
- 461
- Against
- 127
- Abstained
- 33
roll-call vote at 13:32 · 74% of votes cast in favour
Split vote by Greens, ECR, Patriots
The part voted on: ‘new construction; calls, following a comprehensive impact assessment, for a reform of the VAT Directive that could allow for the application of a super-reduced value added tax rate to the supply and construction of housing, as part of a social policy, as defined by the Member States, to renovation and alteration, including demolition and reconstruction, and repairing of housing and private dwellings, and to the letting of immovable property for residential use;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 37 | 1 | 38 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 45 | 0 | 45 | Against |
| S&D | 100 | 4 | 17 | 121 | For |
| Renew | 54 | 9 | 5 | 68 | For |
| EPP | 161 | 1 | 0 | 162 | For |
| ECR | 70 | 1 | 1 | 72 | For |
| Patriots | 61 | 4 | 0 | 65 | For |
| ESN | 3 | 20 | 2 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 12 | 6 | 7 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
68 MEPs of 621 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.