Paragraph 21 — part 4
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 21/4
Adopted
- For
- 487
- Against
- 125
- Abstained
- 10
roll-call vote at 13:30 · 78% of votes cast in favour
Split vote by Greens, The Left
The part voted on: ‘warns about the possible consequences of such labelling; acknowledges that the practical implementation of the Energy Efficiency Directive affects many construction companies and private owners;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 37 | 0 | 37 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 46 | 0 | 46 | Against |
| S&D | 100 | 18 | 4 | 122 | For |
| Renew | 69 | 0 | 0 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 158 | 1 | 1 | 160 | For |
| ECR | 73 | 0 | 0 | 73 | For |
| Patriots | 65 | 0 | 0 | 65 | For |
| ESN | 4 | 20 | 1 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 18 | 3 | 4 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 622 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.