Paragraph 21 — part 1
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 21/1
Adopted
- For
- 499
- Against
- 105
- Abstained
- 19
roll-call vote at 13:30 · 80% of votes cast in favour
Split vote by Greens, The Left
The part voted on: Text as a whole without the words: ‘acknowledges that the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive imposes building requirements that could affect construction costs;’ do not have a negative impact on both rental and property markets; expresses concern about the calculation methods and inconsistencies in the energy labelling of residential buildings, which should’, ‘warns about the possible consequences of such labelling; acknowledges that the practical implementation of the Energy Efficiency Directive affects many construction companies and private owners;’ and ‘while respecting national priorities and available resources’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 37 | 0 | 0 | 37 | For |
| Greens | 46 | 0 | 0 | 46 | For |
| S&D | 120 | 3 | 0 | 123 | For |
| Renew | 69 | 0 | 0 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 161 | 1 | 0 | 162 | For |
| ECR | 34 | 30 | 6 | 70 | Divided |
| Patriots | 22 | 37 | 7 | 66 | Divided |
| ESN | 0 | 24 | 1 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 10 | 10 | 5 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
66 MEPs of 623 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.