Amendment 59 — part 2 to paragraph 21
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 21 – Am 59/2
Rejected
- For
- 189
- Against
- 400
- Abstained
- 23
roll-call vote at 13:29 · 31% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN
The part voted on: ‘which, through mandatory renovations, imposes unrealistic financial burdens on homeowners ranging from EUR 15 000 to EUR 100 000 per building; stresses that mandating the zero-emission building standard drastically increases construction costs and discourages new investment, which is extremely irresponsible in the face of the housing crisis; maintains that owners and the free market must determine the pace of property modernisation;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 36 | 0 | 36 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 46 | 0 | 46 | Against |
| S&D | 0 | 119 | 0 | 119 | Against |
| Renew | 0 | 67 | 0 | 67 | Against |
| EPP | 23 | 126 | 9 | 158 | Against |
| ECR | 71 | 0 | 1 | 72 | For |
| Patriots | 57 | 0 | 7 | 64 | For |
| ESN | 24 | 0 | 0 | 24 | For |
| No group | 14 | 6 | 6 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
26 MEPs of 612 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.