Amendment 58 — part 2, after paragraph 20
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 20 – Am 58/2
Rejected
- For
- 193
- Against
- 404
- Abstained
- 24
roll-call vote at 13:28 · 31% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN
The part voted on: ‘considering that it functions as an anti-social and economically harmful de facto tax on heating; points out that including homes in emissions trading will lead to a rapid increase in housing costs, hitting low-income families hardest; opposes the ideological inflation of energy prices, which undermines the competitiveness of the European construction sector and pushes millions of citizens toward energy poverty;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 34 | 0 | 34 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 46 | 0 | 46 | Against |
| S&D | 0 | 123 | 0 | 123 | Against |
| Renew | 0 | 69 | 0 | 69 | Against |
| EPP | 24 | 127 | 10 | 161 | Against |
| ECR | 66 | 0 | 7 | 73 | For |
| Patriots | 62 | 0 | 4 | 66 | For |
| ESN | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | For |
| No group | 16 | 5 | 3 | 24 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
24 MEPs of 621 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.