Paragraph 19 — part 2
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 19/2
Adopted
- For
- 518
- Against
- 87
- Abstained
- 23
roll-call vote at 13:27 · 82% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: ‘calls on the Commission and the Member States to fully integrate the Commission’s Renovation Wave strategy into housing policies, including support schemes for private housing upgrades, ensuring that building renovation is not only focused on energy efficiency and decarbonisation, but also on social fairness and the expansion of affordable housing supply, improving quality of life, preventing disproportionate rent hikes during renovations and reducing long-term housing costs; stresses the importance of setting specific renovation earmarks within the forthcoming European Affordable Housing Plan and of contributing to improving the average energy performance levels of the residential housing sector and prioritising the worst performing buildings; calls on Member States facing high concentrations of low-efficiency, standardised multistorey buildings to develop mechanisms that enable the necessary renovation rates to meet EU targets; supports incentives for the renovation of dwellings in densely populated areas and advocates solutions that positively incentivise owners to put houses back on the market to make them available for long-term renting, particularly in pressured urban areas; underlines that when designing housing policies, competent authorities should be able to carry out a single and thorough environmental assessment, avoiding unnecessary duplications, and complete the necessary administrative and procedural steps for a given geographic area prior to the development of residential projects;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 38 | 0 | 0 | 38 | For |
| Greens | 46 | 0 | 0 | 46 | For |
| S&D | 123 | 0 | 0 | 123 | For |
| Renew | 68 | 1 | 0 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 161 | 0 | 2 | 163 | For |
| ECR | 56 | 13 | 3 | 72 | For |
| Patriots | 16 | 43 | 7 | 66 | Divided |
| ESN | 0 | 24 | 1 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 10 | 6 | 10 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
26 MEPs of 628 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.