Paragraph 16 — part 7
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 16/7
Adopted
- For
- 486
- Against
- 119
- Abstained
- 20
roll-call vote at 13:26 · 78% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, ECR
The part voted on: ‘allowing shorter procedures to be activated at national level and to introduce fast-track approval procedures’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 38 | 0 | 38 | Against |
| Greens | 6 | 40 | 0 | 46 | Against |
| S&D | 118 | 4 | 0 | 122 | For |
| Renew | 66 | 2 | 0 | 68 | For |
| EPP | 160 | 1 | 1 | 162 | For |
| ECR | 63 | 2 | 8 | 73 | For |
| Patriots | 61 | 5 | 0 | 66 | For |
| ESN | 1 | 22 | 1 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 11 | 5 | 10 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
26 MEPs of 625 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.