Paragraph 16 — part 6
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 16/6
Adopted
- For
- 431
- Against
- 132
- Abstained
- 66
roll-call vote at 13:26 · 69% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, ECR
The part voted on: ‘priority’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 8 | 30 | 0 | 38 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 0 | 46 | 46 | Abstained |
| S&D | 119 | 0 | 4 | 123 | For |
| Renew | 67 | 2 | 0 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 160 | 1 | 2 | 163 | For |
| ECR | 7 | 66 | 0 | 73 | Against |
| Patriots | 57 | 5 | 4 | 66 | For |
| ESN | 1 | 23 | 1 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 12 | 5 | 9 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 629 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.