Paragraph 16 — part 2
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 16/2
Adopted
- For
- 466
- Against
- 133
- Abstained
- 25
roll-call vote at 13:25 · 75% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, ECR
The part voted on: ‘including through measures such as introducing the principle of positive administrative silence for the issuance of building permits for new construction and renovation works,’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 1 | 37 | 0 | 38 | Against |
| Greens | 8 | 37 | 1 | 46 | Against |
| S&D | 98 | 23 | 0 | 121 | For |
| Renew | 65 | 4 | 0 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 160 | 1 | 1 | 162 | For |
| ECR | 65 | 3 | 5 | 73 | For |
| Patriots | 54 | 6 | 5 | 65 | For |
| ESN | 5 | 17 | 2 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 10 | 5 | 11 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
24 MEPs of 624 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.