Paragraph 16 — part 1
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 16/1
Adopted
- For
- 577
- Against
- 44
- Abstained
- 7
roll-call vote at 13:25 · 92% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, ECR
The part voted on: Text as a whole without the words: ‘including through measures such as introducing the principle of positive administrative silence for the issuance of building permits for new construction and renovation works,’, ‘calls on the Commission to urge the Member States to set out a goal to achieve housing permits within a deadline of 60 days to deliver decent, sustainable and affordable housing;’ ‘calls on the Member States to promote the delivery of housing’ and ‘priority’ and ‘allowing shorter procedures to be activated at national level and to introduce fast-track approval procedures’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 38 | 0 | 0 | 38 | For |
| Greens | 46 | 0 | 0 | 46 | For |
| S&D | 121 | 1 | 0 | 122 | For |
| Renew | 67 | 2 | 0 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 163 | 0 | 0 | 163 | For |
| ECR | 68 | 5 | 0 | 73 | For |
| Patriots | 54 | 12 | 0 | 66 | For |
| ESN | 1 | 22 | 2 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 19 | 2 | 5 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
66 MEPs of 628 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.