Paragraph 13 — part 2
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 13/2
Adopted
- For
- 443
- Against
- 87
- Abstained
- 96
roll-call vote at 13:24 · 71% of votes cast in favour
Split vote by ECR, Patriots
The part voted on: ‘urges competent public authorities to mobilise publicly owned land, review land zoning regulations and reclassify infrastructure-ready land for immediate development, to fast-track the delivery of affordable housing and cooperative, social and non-profit models; highlights that any land-use strategy must balance housing needs with high-quality construction standards;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 6 | 12 | 19 | 37 | Divided |
| Greens | 46 | 0 | 0 | 46 | For |
| S&D | 122 | 1 | 0 | 123 | For |
| Renew | 66 | 2 | 1 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 159 | 1 | 1 | 161 | For |
| ECR | 6 | 12 | 54 | 72 | Abstained |
| Patriots | 18 | 37 | 11 | 66 | Divided |
| ESN | 0 | 22 | 3 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 20 | 0 | 7 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 626 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.