Paragraph 11 — part 7
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/7
Adopted
- For
- 439
- Against
- 160
- Abstained
- 23
roll-call vote at 13:23 · 71% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, ECR, The Left, Patriots
The part voted on: ‘recalls that evidence shows that price controls and state interventions can lead to unexpected outcomes, and any such measures should be targeted to limit distortions in the market; notes that such measures create uncertainty, discourage investment, and deter those who could help expand supply;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 3 | 35 | 0 | 38 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 45 | 0 | 45 | Against |
| S&D | 90 | 28 | 4 | 122 | For |
| Renew | 67 | 0 | 1 | 68 | For |
| EPP | 157 | 1 | 0 | 158 | For |
| ECR | 70 | 1 | 2 | 73 | For |
| Patriots | 40 | 22 | 4 | 66 | Divided |
| ESN | 5 | 17 | 3 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 7 | 11 | 9 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 622 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.