Paragraph 11 — part 6
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/6
Adopted
- For
- 516
- Against
- 40
- Abstained
- 66
roll-call vote at 13:23 · 83% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, ECR, The Left, Patriots
The part voted on: ‘considers that such an audit should remedy the identified shortcomings;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 27 | 9 | 2 | 38 | For |
| Greens | 0 | 0 | 46 | 46 | Abstained |
| S&D | 122 | 0 | 0 | 122 | For |
| Renew | 69 | 0 | 0 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 161 | 1 | 0 | 162 | For |
| ECR | 65 | 2 | 4 | 71 | For |
| Patriots | 53 | 4 | 7 | 64 | For |
| ESN | 1 | 19 | 4 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 18 | 5 | 3 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
24 MEPs of 622 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.