Paragraph 11 — part 5
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/5
Adopted
- For
- 545
- Against
- 29
- Abstained
- 52
roll-call vote at 13:22 · 87% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, ECR, The Left, Patriots
The part voted on: ‘calls for a joint regulatory audit by the Commission and the European Court of Auditors of EU legislation that may be hindering affordable housing supply;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 35 | 2 | 0 | 37 | For |
| Greens | 5 | 0 | 41 | 46 | Abstained |
| S&D | 122 | 0 | 0 | 122 | For |
| Renew | 69 | 0 | 0 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 161 | 2 | 0 | 163 | For |
| ECR | 66 | 2 | 4 | 72 | For |
| Patriots | 62 | 0 | 4 | 66 | For |
| ESN | 2 | 21 | 1 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 23 | 2 | 2 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
24 MEPs of 626 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.