Paragraph 11 — part 4
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/4
Adopted
- For
- 477
- Against
- 120
- Abstained
- 18
roll-call vote at 13:22 · 78% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, ECR, The Left, Patriots
The part voted on: ‘by reducing regulatory burdens, refraining from adding further administrative layers, eliminating unnecessary obstacles and red tape, and alleviating bottlenecks in local, national and EU legislation that undermine the competitiveness of the construction and renovation sectors,’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 38 | 0 | 38 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 45 | 1 | 46 | Against |
| S&D | 103 | 14 | 0 | 117 | For |
| Renew | 68 | 0 | 0 | 68 | For |
| EPP | 156 | 2 | 0 | 158 | For |
| ECR | 69 | 0 | 2 | 71 | For |
| Patriots | 60 | 0 | 6 | 66 | For |
| ESN | 3 | 16 | 6 | 25 | Divided |
| No group | 18 | 5 | 3 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 615 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.