Paragraph 11 — part 1
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/1
Adopted
- For
- 565
- Against
- 39
- Abstained
- 21
roll-call vote at 13:22 · 90% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, ECR, The Left, Patriots
The part voted on: Text as a whole without the words: ‘large-scale’ and ‘abusive’ and ‘by reducing regulatory burdens, refraining from adding further administrative layers, eliminating unnecessary obstacles and red tape, and alleviating bottlenecks in local, national and EU legislation that undermine the competitiveness of the construction and renovation sectors,’, ‘calls for a joint regulatory audit by the Commission and the European Court of Auditors of EU legislation that may be hindering affordable housing supply; considers that such an audit should remedy the identified shortcomings;’ ‘recalls that evidence shows that price controls and state interventions can lead to unexpected outcomes, and any such measures should be targeted to limit distortions in the market; notes that such measures create uncertainty, discourage investment, and deter those who could help expand supply;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 37 | 0 | 0 | 37 | For |
| Greens | 46 | 0 | 0 | 46 | For |
| S&D | 121 | 0 | 0 | 121 | For |
| Renew | 68 | 0 | 0 | 68 | For |
| EPP | 161 | 2 | 0 | 163 | For |
| ECR | 65 | 5 | 2 | 72 | For |
| Patriots | 43 | 9 | 14 | 66 | Divided |
| ESN | 3 | 19 | 3 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 21 | 4 | 2 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
66 MEPs of 625 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.