Amendments 25 + 34 (voted as one) to paragraph 37
The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – § 37 – Am 25D= 34D=
Rejected
- For
- 191
- Against
- 423
- Abstained
- 48
roll-call vote at 12:55 · 29% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 36 | 0 | 1 | 37 | For |
| Greens | 2 | 9 | 40 | 51 | Abstained |
| S&D | 0 | 125 | 0 | 125 | Against |
| Renew | 0 | 69 | 0 | 69 | Against |
| EPP | 7 | 174 | 0 | 181 | Against |
| ECR | 26 | 39 | 5 | 70 | Divided |
| Patriots | 79 | 0 | 0 | 79 | For |
| ESN | 22 | 2 | 0 | 24 | For |
| No group | 19 | 5 | 2 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
24 MEPs of 662 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.