Paragraph 49 — part 4
Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024
A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 49/4
Adopted
- For
- 369
- Against
- 269
- Abstained
- 23
roll-call vote at 14:12 · 56% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Patriots, ECR
The part voted on: ‘reiterates its call for the Council to gradually switch to qualified majority voting for decisions on the CFSP and CSDP, at least in those areas that do not have military implications;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 3 | 37 | 4 | 44 | Against |
| Greens | 51 | 0 | 0 | 51 | For |
| S&D | 110 | 12 | 5 | 127 | For |
| Renew | 66 | 5 | 1 | 72 | For |
| EPP | 137 | 21 | 9 | 167 | For |
| ECR | 1 | 71 | 3 | 75 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 80 | 0 | 80 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 22 | 1 | 23 | Against |
| No group | 1 | 21 | 0 | 22 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
75 MEPs of 661 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.