Paragraph 44 — part 2
Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 44/2
Adopted
- For
- 381
- Against
- 275
- Abstained
- 19
roll-call vote at 13:49 · 56% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR
The part voted on: ‘regrets that the potential for fast, efficient and effective foreign, security and defence action, as provided for, inter alia, by the passerelle clauses of the TEU, has never been used;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 7 | 33 | 3 | 43 | Against |
| Greens | 51 | 0 | 0 | 51 | For |
| S&D | 123 | 3 | 7 | 133 | For |
| Renew | 68 | 4 | 0 | 72 | For |
| EPP | 129 | 37 | 6 | 172 | For |
| ECR | 0 | 77 | 1 | 78 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 79 | 0 | 79 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 22 | 2 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 3 | 20 | 0 | 23 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
24 MEPs of 675 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.