Every vote on this decision
Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024
231 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published., where every MEP’s position is recorded.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 46 amendments (8 adopted, 38 rejected) and 184 parts of the text voted on separately (103 adopted, 60 rejected, 21 lapsed).
A proposed change to the text, voted on before the final vote. · 46
46 amendment votes: 8 adopted, 38 rejected
-
Vote 1:Amendment 14 to paragraph 1
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 1 – Am 14
Rejected 197 for, 463 against, 10 abstained
13:33Roll call requested by ESN
-
Vote 15:Amendment 27 to paragraph 4, after indent 6
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 4, after indent 6 – Am 27
Adopted 548 for, 60 against, 64 abstained
13:34Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 16:Amendment 145 to paragraph 4, indent 7
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 4, indent 7 – Am 145
Rejected 192 for, 448 against, 11 abstained
13:34Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 23:Amendment 147 to paragraph 4, after indent 8
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 4, after indent 8 – Am 147
Rejected 172 for, 445 against, 22 abstained
13:35Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 29:Amendment 149 to paragraph 4, indent 20
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 4, indent 20 – Am 149
Rejected 187 for, 469 against, 14 abstained
13:35 -
Vote 47:Amendment 30 to paragraph 8 — part 1
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 8 – Am 30/1
Rejected 246 for, 379 against, 52 abstained
13:38Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by S&D
The part voted on
‘expresses deep concern over the shift in the United States’ stance on Russia’s war of aggression, up to openly blaming Ukraine for the ongoing war, suspending US military aid and attempting to coerce Ukraine into relinquishing its legitimate right to self-defence and making territorial concessions;’
-
Vote 48:Amendment 30 to paragraph 8 — part 2
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 8 – Am 30/2
Rejected 130 for, 463 against, 77 abstained
13:38Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by S&D
‘urges the Commission and the Member States to develop an independent foreign and security policy on the basis of international law;’
-
Vote 54:Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 9
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – After § 9 – Am 31
Rejected 121 for, 500 against, 52 abstained
13:38Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 55:Amendment 32, adding text after paragraph 9
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – After § 9 – Am 32
Rejected 70 for, 565 against, 38 abstained
13:38Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 57:Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 9
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – After § 9 – Am 34
Rejected 106 for, 518 against, 42 abstained
13:39Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 58:Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 9
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – After § 9 – Am 35
Rejected 102 for, 486 against, 40 abstained
13:39Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 74:Amendment 18 to paragraph 28
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 28 – Am 18
Rejected 237 for, 339 against, 97 abstained
13:40Roll call requested by S&D
-
Vote 75:Amendment 154 to paragraph 28
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 28 – Am 154
Rejected 185 for, 445 against, 20 abstained
13:40Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 81:Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 28
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – After § 28 – Am 36
Rejected 114 for, 532 against, 28 abstained
13:41Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 83:Amendment 106, adding text after paragraph 28 — part 1
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – After § 28 – Am 106/1
Adopted 406 for, 227 against, 39 abstained
13:42Roll call requested by The Left, S&D · split vote by S&D
The part voted on
‘Believes that the Association Council with Israel, held in Brussels on 24 February 2025, was a first step towards re-engaging in frank and open discussion with the Israeli Foreign Minister, which will require following up;’
-
Vote 84:Amendment 106, adding text after paragraph 28 — part 2
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – After § 28 – Am 106/2
Adopted 537 for, 77 against, 57 abstained
13:42Roll call requested by The Left, S&D · split vote by S&D
The part voted on
‘acknowledges the value of engaging with Israel to strengthen the EU’s role in the Middle East, while stressing that the partnership must be based on full respect for rights and values; recalls that compliance with Article 2 of the Association Agreement is a crucial element of the partnership and calls for continued monitoring and assessment of its implementation by the Israeli Government; welcomes the anticipated High-Level Dialogue with the Palestinian Prime Minister in April 2025;’
-
Vote 89:Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 29
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – After § 29 – Am 37
Rejected 114 for, 517 against, 40 abstained
13:43Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 90:Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 29
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – After § 29 – Am 38
Rejected 196 for, 420 against, 49 abstained
13:43Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 91:Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 29
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – After § 29 – Am 39
Rejected 258 for, 347 against, 69 abstained
13:43Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 99:Amendment 19 to paragraph 30
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 30 – Am 19
Rejected 284 for, 355 against, 34 abstained
13:44Roll call requested by S&D
-
Vote 113:Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 35 — part 1
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – After § 35 – Am 45/1
Adopted 451 for, 140 against, 74 abstained
13:46Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by EPP
‘Echoes the call of ICC President Judge Tomoko Akane for the EU to take immediate action to protect the ICC and the rule of law in the international community,’
-
Vote 114:Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 35 — part 2
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – After § 35 – Am 45/2
Adopted 439 for, 181 against, 43 abstained
13:46Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by EPP
‘including by swiftly amending the EU blocking statute to bring the ICC within its scope;’
-
Vote 117:Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 37
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – After § 37 – Am 46
Rejected 291 for, 335 against, 42 abstained
13:46Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 122:Amendment 159 to paragraph 41
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 41 – Am 159
Rejected 134 for, 450 against, 72 abstained
13:47Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 124:Amendment 48, adding text after paragraph 41
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – After § 41 – Am 48
Rejected 239 for, 409 against, 23 abstained
13:47Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 129:Amendment 15 to paragraph 43
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 43 – Am 15
Rejected 228 for, 429 against, 11 abstained
13:48Roll call requested by ESN
-
Vote 132:Amendment 49 to paragraph 44
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 44 – Am 49
Rejected 205 for, 403 against, 71 abstained
13:48Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 135:Amendment 16 to paragraph 45
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 45 – Am 16
Rejected 239 for, 418 against, 16 abstained
13:49Roll call requested by ESN
-
Vote 147:Amendment 50 to paragraph 50
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 50 – Am 50
Rejected 92 for, 536 against, 44 abstained
13:51Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 157:Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 51
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – After § 51 – Am 17
Rejected 196 for, 445 against, 30 abstained
13:52Roll call requested by ESN
-
Vote 158:Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 51
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – After § 51 – Am 51
Rejected 206 for, 396 against, 71 abstained
13:52Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 165:Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 70
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – After § 70 – Am 52
Rejected 133 for, 450 against, 77 abstained
13:53Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 168:Amendment 164 to paragraph 74
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 74 – Am 164
Rejected 194 for, 472 against, 11 abstained
13:53Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 171:Amendment 53 to paragraph 76
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 76 – Am 53
Rejected 266 for, 324 against, 88 abstained
13:53Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 172:Amendment 64 to paragraph 76
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 76 – Am 64
Rejected 230 for, 320 against, 125 abstained
13:54Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 173:Amendment 1 to paragraph 76
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 76 – Am 1
Adopted 265 for, 254 against, 146 abstained
13:54Roll call requested by ECR
-
Vote 176:Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 76
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – After § 76 – Am 54
Rejected 127 for, 480 against, 60 abstained
13:54Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 177:Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 76
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – After § 76 – Am 55
Rejected 273 for, 344 against, 52 abstained
13:54Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 179:Amendment 65 to paragraph 81
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 81 – Am 65
Adopted 349 for, 288 against, 29 abstained
13:55Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 180:Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 87
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – After § 87 – Am 7
Adopted 566 for, 36 against, 67 abstained
13:55Roll call requested by ECR
-
Vote 187:Amendment 9 to paragraph 97, indent 3
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 97, indent 3 – Am 9
Rejected 242 for, 404 against, 22 abstained
13:56Roll call requested by ECR
-
Vote 206:Amendment 21, adding text after recital L
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – After recital L – Am 21
Rejected 243 for, 353 against, 76 abstained
13:58Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 209:Amendment 24, adding text after recital L
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – After recital L – Am 24
Rejected 237 for, 340 against, 95 abstained
13:58Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 212:Amendment 12 to recital Q
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – recital Q – Am 12
Rejected 141 for, 464 against, 70 abstained
13:59Roll call requested by ESN
-
Vote 213:Amendment 13, adding text after recital Q
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – After recital Q – Am 13
Rejected 92 for, 554 against, 23 abstained
13:59Roll call requested by ESN
-
Vote 217:Amendment 26 to recital U
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – recital U – Am 26
Rejected 75 for, 533 against, 58 abstained
13:59Roll call requested by The Left
A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. · 184
184 votes on parts of the text: 103 adopted, 60 rejected, 21 lapsed or other
-
Vote 2:Separate vote on paragraph 1, after point 1
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 3:Separate vote on paragraph 3, introductory part
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 4:Separate vote on paragraph 3, indent 2
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 5:Separate vote on paragraph 3, indent 3
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 6:Separate vote on paragraph 3, indent 5
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 7:Separate vote on paragraph 3, indent 5
Lapsed no count
-
Vote 8:Separate vote on paragraph 3, indent 6
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by EPP
-
Vote 9:Separate vote on paragraph 3, indent 6
Lapsed show of hands
Separate vote by EPP
-
Vote 10:Separate vote on paragraph 3, indent 8
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 11:Separate vote on paragraph 3, indent 12
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 12:Separate vote on paragraph 4, indent 1
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 13:Separate vote on paragraph 4, indent 2
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 14:Separate vote on paragraph 4, indent 2
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 17:Separate vote on paragraph 4, indent 7
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, EPP
-
Vote 18:Paragraph 4, indent 7 — part 2
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 4, indent 7/2
Rejected 282 for, 340 against, 46 abstained
13:34Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by ECR, EPP
that word
-
Vote 19:Separate vote on paragraph 4, indent 8
Rejected show of hands
Roll call requested by ESN
-
Vote 20:Separate vote on paragraph 4, indent 8
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 4, indent 8
Adopted 664 for, 5 against, 8 abstained
13:34Roll call requested by ESN
-
Vote 21:Separate vote on paragraph 4, after indent 8
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 22:Separate vote on paragraph 4, after indent 8
Lapsed show of hands
-
Vote 24:Separate vote on paragraph 4, indent 9
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 25:Separate vote on paragraph 4, indent 11
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 26:Separate vote on paragraph 4, indent 15
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 27:Paragraph 4, indent 16 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Greens
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘recalls that stability in the Sahel has direct repercussions for the security of European external borders and the management of irregular migration flows from the African continent;’
-
Vote 28:Paragraph 4, indent 16 — part 2 of 2
Adopted 448 for, 223 against, 1 abstained
Split vote by Greens
those words
-
Vote 30:Separate vote on paragraph 4, indent 20
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 4, indent 20
Adopted 528 for, 61 against, 85 abstained
13:36Roll call requested by ECR
-
Vote 31:Separate vote on paragraph 4, indent 21
Adopted 372 for, 247 against, 45 abstained
Separate vote by EPP
-
Vote 32:Separate vote on paragraph 4, after indent 21
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 33:Separate vote on paragraph 4, after indent 24
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 34:Separate vote on paragraph 4, indent 26
Rejected show of hands
Split vote by ECR
-
Vote 35:Separate vote on paragraph 4, indent 26
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
-
Vote 36:Separate vote on paragraph 4, indent 26
Lapsed show of hands
Split vote by ECR
-
Vote 37:Separate vote on paragraph 4, indent 26
Lapsed show of hands
Split vote by ECR
-
Vote 38:Separate vote on paragraph 5, indent 2
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 39:Separate vote on paragraph 5, indent 3
Adopted 341 for, 299 against, 23 abstained
-
Vote 40:Separate vote on paragraph 5, indent 3
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 41:Separate vote on paragraph 5, indent 5
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 42:Separate vote on paragraph 5, indent 6
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 43:Separate vote on paragraph 5, indent 10
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 44:Separate vote on paragraph 5, indent 14
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 45:Separate vote on paragraph 5, indent 15
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by ECR
-
Vote 46:Separate vote on paragraph 7
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 49:Separate vote on paragraph 9
Rejected show of hands
Split vote by ECR, EPP
-
Vote 50:Separate vote on paragraph 9
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, EPP
-
Vote 51:Separate vote on paragraph 9
Lapsed show of hands
Split vote by ECR, EPP
-
Vote 53:Separate vote on paragraph 9
Lapsed show of hands
Split vote by ECR, EPP
-
Vote 56:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 9
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 59:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 9
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 60:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 9
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 61:Separate vote on paragraph 10
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 62:Separate vote on paragraph 11
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 63:Separate vote on paragraph 13
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 64:Separate vote on paragraph 17
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 65:Separate vote on paragraph 19
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 66:Separate vote on paragraph 20
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 67:Separate vote on paragraph 20
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 68:Separate vote on paragraph 20
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 69:Separate vote on paragraph 21
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 70:Separate vote on paragraph 21
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 71:Separate vote on paragraph 22
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 72:Separate vote on paragraph 23
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 73:Separate vote on paragraph 24
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 76:Paragraph 28 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, EPP
The part voted on
‘Affirms the right of Israel to defend itself as enshrined in and constrained by international law; recalls that Israel has the obligation to address the risk of mass starvation and the outbreak of disease epidemics in Gaza; recalls that Israel also has the obligation to protect the civilian population and that military operations must be proportionate and in line with international humanitarian law;’
-
Vote 77:Paragraph 28 — part 2
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 28/2
Adopted 341 for, 201 against, 107 abstained
13:41Split vote by ECR, EPP
The part voted on
‘expresses in the strongest terms its concern about the disproportionate military action by the Israeli Defence Forces in the Gaza Strip and in the West Bank and in Lebanon;’ without the words: ‘in the strongest terms’ and ‘disproportionate’
-
Vote 78:Paragraph 28 — part 3
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 28/3
Rejected 308 for, 332 against, 35 abstained
13:41Split vote by ECR, EPP
‘In the strongest terms’
-
Vote 79:Paragraph 28 — part 4
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 28/4
Rejected 290 for, 339 against, 33 abstained
13:41Split vote by ECR, EPP
‘disproportionate’
-
Vote 80:Paragraph 28 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, EPP
The part voted on
‘expresses in the strongest terms its concern about the disproportionate military action by the Israeli Defence Forces in the Gaza Strip and in the West Bank and in Lebanon;’ without the words: ‘in the strongest terms’ and ‘disproportionate’
-
Vote 82:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 28
Adopted 528 for, 30 against, 105 abstained
-
Vote 85:Separate vote on paragraph 29
Rejected show of hands
Split vote by EPP
-
Vote 86:Separate vote on paragraph 29
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by EPP
-
Vote 87:Separate vote on paragraph 29
Lapsed show of hands
Split vote by EPP
-
Vote 88:Separate vote on paragraph 29
Lapsed show of hands
Split vote by EPP
-
Vote 92:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 29
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 93:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 29
Rejected 255 for, 360 against, 59 abstained
-
Vote 94:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 29
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 95:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 29
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 96:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 29
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 97:Paragraph 30 — part 1 of 3
Rejected show of hands
Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by ECR, EPP
‘Supports a just and viable solution to the question of Palestinian refugees;’
-
Vote 98:Paragraph 30 — part 2 of 3
Rejected show of hands
Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by ECR, EPP
The part voted on
‘underscores that the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) plays an important role in providing humanitarian aid and essential services which in the present circumstances must not be interrupted, and’
-
Vote 100:Paragraph 30 — part 3 of 3
Rejected show of hands
Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by ECR, EPP
‘considers that all UN agencies active in the region must be supported in their efforts;’
-
Vote 101:Paragraph 30 — part 1
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 30/1
Adopted 603 for, 31 against, 45 abstained
13:44Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by ECR, EPP
‘Supports a just and viable solution to the question of Palestinian refugees;’
-
Vote 102:Paragraph 30 — part 2
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 30/2
Adopted 357 for, 95 against, 209 abstained
13:44Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by ECR, EPP
The part voted on
‘underscores that the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) plays an important role in providing humanitarian aid and essential services which in the present circumstances must not be interrupted, and’
-
Vote 103:Paragraph 30 — part 3
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 30/3
Adopted 571 for, 43 against, 57 abstained
13:44Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by ECR, EPP
‘considers that all UN agencies active in the region must be supported in their efforts;’
-
Vote 104:Paragraph 30 — part 4
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 30/4
Adopted 614 for, 42 against, 15 abstained
13:45Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by ECR, EPP
The part voted on
‘recalls, however, its concern regarding serious allegations made against staff members of UNRWA which suggest that UNRWA has employed members of the terrorist organisation Hamas; welcomes the actions taken by the UN following the allegations regarding the Agency’s staff and welcomes UNRWA’s full commitment to implement the recommendations stemming from the ‘Colonna report’;’
-
Vote 105:Paragraph 30 — part 5
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 30/5
Adopted 509 for, 39 against, 119 abstained
13:45Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by ECR, EPP
‘echoes the European Council conclusions of 17 October 2024 which condemn any attempt to abrogate the 1967 agreement between Israel and UNRWA;’
-
Vote 106:Paragraph 30 — part 6
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 30/6
Adopted 620 for, 40 against, 3 abstained
13:45Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by ECR, EPP
The part voted on
‘insists that the Commission ensure that no funds from the EU budget finance, contribute to or support the activities of Hamas or Hezbollah; stresses that additional measures may be needed in the future to strive for even more transparency and accountability;’
-
Vote 107:Separate vote on paragraph 31
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 108:Separate vote on paragraph 32
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 109:Separate vote on paragraph 33
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 110:Separate vote on paragraph 33
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 111:Paragraph 34 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by EPP
Text as a whole without the words: ‘in its entirety’
-
Vote 112:Paragraph 34 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by EPP
those words
-
Vote 115:Separate vote on paragraph 36
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 116:Separate vote on paragraph 37
Adopted 316 for, 229 against, 124 abstained
Separate vote by EPP
-
Vote 118:Separate vote on paragraph 38
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 119:Separate vote on paragraph 39
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 120:Paragraph 40 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Greens
Text as a whole without the words: ‘at all costs’
-
Vote 121:Paragraph 40 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Greens
those words
-
Vote 123:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 41
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 125:Separate vote on paragraph 42
Rejected 106 for, 426 against, 133 abstained
-
Vote 126:Separate vote on paragraph 42
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 127:Separate vote on paragraph 42
Lapsed show of hands
-
Vote 128:Separate vote on paragraph 42
Adopted 373 for, 288 against, 11 abstained
-
Vote 130:Separate vote on paragraph 43
Rejected show of hands
Separate vote by The Left
-
Vote 131:Separate vote on paragraph 43
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by The Left
-
Vote 133:Separate vote on paragraph 44
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
-
Vote 134:Paragraph 44 — part 2
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 44/2
Adopted 381 for, 275 against, 19 abstained
13:49Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR
The part voted on
‘regrets that the potential for fast, efficient and effective foreign, security and defence action, as provided for, inter alia, by the passerelle clauses of the TEU, has never been used;’
-
Vote 136:Paragraph 45 — part 1
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 45/1
Adopted 345 for, 305 against, 26 abstained
13:49Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by ECR · separate vote by The Left
The part voted on
‘Reiterates its call for the Council to gradually switch to qualified majority voting for decisions in areas of the CFSP that do not have military or defence implications;’
-
Vote 137:Paragraph 45 — part 2
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 45/2
Adopted 547 for, 81 against, 39 abstained
13:49Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by ECR · separate vote by The Left
‘acknowledges the concerns of some Member States, which fear a decreased ability to influence foreign and security policy at EU level; encourages,’
-
Vote 138:Paragraph 45 — part 3
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 45/3
Adopted 339 for, 299 against, 32 abstained
13:49Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by ECR · separate vote by The Left
‘pending the full application of qualified majority voting to decisions without military or defence implications,’
-
Vote 139:Paragraph 45 — part 4
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 45/4
Adopted 369 for, 267 against, 41 abstained
13:50Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by ECR · separate vote by The Left
‘the full use of all currently existing possibilities to enhance decisiveness in this regard,’
-
Vote 140:Paragraph 45 — part 5
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 45/5
Adopted 362 for, 283 against, 30 abstained
13:50Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by ECR · separate vote by The Left
The part voted on
‘including the use of constructive abstention in line with Article 31(1) TEU; recognises that progress towards the application of qualified majority voting can only be gradual, building on the formation of a European strategic culture;’
-
Vote 141:Separate vote on paragraph 46
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 142:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 46
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 143:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 46
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 144:Separate vote on paragraph 48
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
-
Vote 145:Paragraph 48 — part 2
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 48/2
Adopted 415 for, 251 against, 11 abstained
13:50Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR
those words
-
Vote 146:Separate vote on paragraph 49
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 148:Separate vote on paragraph 50
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by The Left
-
Vote 149:Separate vote on paragraph 50
Rejected 291 for, 373 against, 9 abstained
Split vote by The Left
-
Vote 150:Separate vote on paragraph 50
Lapsed show of hands
Split vote by The Left
-
Vote 152:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 50
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 153:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 50
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 154:Separate vote on paragraph 51
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR · separate vote by The Left
-
Vote 155:Separate vote on paragraph 51
Lapsed show of hands
Split vote by ECR · separate vote by The Left
-
Vote 156:Separate vote on paragraph 51
Lapsed no count
Split vote by ECR · separate vote by The Left
-
Vote 159:Separate vote on paragraph 58
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 160:Separate vote on paragraph 67
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 161:Separate vote on paragraph 68
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 162:Separate vote on paragraph 69
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 163:Separate vote on paragraph 70
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Greens, EPP
-
Vote 164:Paragraph 70 — part 2
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 70/2
Adopted 410 for, 238 against, 29 abstained
13:52Roll call requested by Greens · split vote by Greens, EPP
those words
-
Vote 166:Separate vote on paragraph 71
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 167:Separate vote on paragraph 74
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 169:Separate vote on paragraph 75
Adopted show of hands
Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 178:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 77
Lapsed no count
-
Vote 181:Separate vote on paragraph 88, indent 3
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 182:Separate vote on paragraph 88, indent 4
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 183:Separate vote on paragraph 88, indent 7
Adopted 327 for, 312 against, 33 abstained
Split vote by Greens
-
Vote 184:Separate vote on paragraph 88, indent 7
Lapsed show of hands
Split vote by Greens
-
Vote 185:Separate vote on paragraph 88, indent 7
Lapsed show of hands
Split vote by Greens
-
Vote 186:Separate vote on paragraph 96
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by Patriots
-
Vote 188:Separate vote on paragraph 97, indent 4
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by ECR
-
Vote 189:Separate vote on citation 1
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 190:Separate vote on citation 6
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 191:Separate vote on citation 7
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 192:Vote on text inserted after citation 13
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 193:Separate vote on citation 37
Adopted 301 for, 298 against, 67 abstained
Separate vote by ECR
-
Vote 194:Separate vote on citation 38
Rejected 282 for, 335 against, 50 abstained
Separate vote by ECR
-
Vote 195:Vote on text inserted after citation 38
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 196:Separate vote on recital B
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 197:Separate vote on recital C
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 198:Separate vote on recital D
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 199:Separate vote on recital E
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 200:Separate vote on recital F
Rejected show of hands
Split vote by Greens
-
Vote 201:Separate vote on recital F
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Greens
-
Vote 202:Separate vote on recital F
Adopted 430 for, 218 against, 22 abstained
Split vote by Greens
-
Vote 203:Separate vote on recital G
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 204:Separate vote on recital G
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 205:Separate vote on recital Η
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 207:Vote on text inserted after recital L
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 208:Vote on text inserted after recital L
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 210:Separate vote on recital M
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 211:Separate vote on recital M
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 214:Separate vote on recital R
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 215:Vote on text inserted after recital R
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 216:Separate vote on recital S
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 218:Separate vote on recital W
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 219:Separate vote on recital Y
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 220:Separate vote on recital Z
Rejected show of hands
Roll call requested by Greens · separate vote by EPP
-
Vote 221:Separate vote on recital Z
Rejected show of hands
Roll call requested by Greens · separate vote by EPP
-
Vote 222:Separate vote on recital Z
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – recital Z
Adopted 403 for, 237 against, 35 abstained
14:00Roll call requested by Greens · separate vote by EPP
-
Vote 223:Separate vote on recital AB
Rejected show of hands
Separate vote by ECR
-
Vote 224:Separate vote on recital AB
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by ECR
-
Vote 225:Separate vote on recital AD
Adopted 428 for, 161 against, 71 abstained
-
Vote 226:Separate vote on recital AH
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 227:Separate vote on recital AI
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 228:Separate vote on recital AJ
Rejected show of hands
Split vote by ECR
-
Vote 229:Separate vote on recital AJ
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
-
Vote 230:Separate vote on recital AJ
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
The last vote on a text as a whole, after all amendments. It decides whether the text is adopted. · 1
-
Vote 231:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted 378 for, 188 against, 105 abstained
14:01