Amendment 76 — part 2 to paragraph 71
White paper on the future of European defence
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 71 – Am 76/2
Rejected
- For
- 217
- Against
- 422
- Abstained
- 29
roll-call vote at 13:12 · 32% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by S&D
The part voted on: ‘reminds the Member States, to this end, of the importance of progressive taxation of capital gains and high incomes as important sources of funding for both the reconstruction of national defence capabilities and comprehensive welfare services;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 26 | 0 | 12 | 38 | For |
| Greens | 51 | 0 | 0 | 51 | For |
| S&D | 125 | 4 | 1 | 130 | For |
| Renew | 1 | 70 | 0 | 71 | Against |
| EPP | 2 | 170 | 0 | 172 | Against |
| ECR | 3 | 67 | 2 | 72 | Against |
| Patriots | 2 | 81 | 0 | 83 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 21 | 2 | 23 | Against |
| No group | 7 | 9 | 12 | 28 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
23 MEPs of 668 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.