Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Every vote on this decision

White paper on the future of European defence

194 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the , where every MEP’s position is recorded.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 79 amendments (14 adopted, 65 rejected) and 106 parts of the text voted on separately (64 adopted, 30 rejected, 12 lapsed). 8 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

· 79

79 amendment votes: 14 adopted, 65 rejected

  1. Vote 1:Amendment 36, adding text before paragraph 1

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – Before § 1 – Am 36

    Rejected 87 for, 520 against, 14 abstained

    12:46

    Roll call requested by The Left

  2. Vote 2:Amendment 37, adding text before paragraph 1

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – Before § 1 – Am 37

    Rejected 93 for, 557 against, 15 abstained

    12:47

    Roll call requested by The Left

  3. Vote 3:Amendment 38, adding text before paragraph 1

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – Before § 1 – Am 38

    Rejected 57 for, 582 against, 23 abstained

    12:47

    Roll call requested by The Left

  4. Vote 4:Amendment 102 to paragraph 1

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 1 – Am 102

    Rejected 94 for, 533 against, 49 abstained

    12:47

    Roll call requested by ECR

  5. Vote 5:Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 1 – Am 2

    Rejected 68 for, 497 against, 99 abstained

    12:47

    Roll call requested by The Left

  6. Vote 6:Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 1 – Am 7

    Rejected 199 for, 447 against, 22 abstained

    12:48

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  7. Vote 7:Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 1

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 1 – Am 39

    Rejected 75 for, 543 against, 60 abstained

    12:48

    Roll call requested by The Left

  8. Vote 8:Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 2

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 2 – Am 3

    Rejected 78 for, 582 against, 15 abstained

    12:48

    Roll call requested by The Left

  9. Vote 10:Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 2

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 2 – Am 41

    Rejected 48 for, 555 against, 67 abstained

    12:48

    Roll call requested by The Left

  10. Vote 11:Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 2

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 2 – Am 42

    Rejected 173 for, 458 against, 48 abstained

    12:48

    Roll call requested by The Left

  11. Vote 12:Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 2

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 2 – Am 43

    Rejected 248 for, 381 against, 43 abstained

    12:48

    Roll call requested by The Left

  12. Vote 13:Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 2

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 2 – Am 44

    Rejected 75 for, 547 against, 60 abstained

    12:49

    Roll call requested by The Left

  13. Vote 18:Amendment 83, adding text after paragraph 3

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 3 – Am 83

    Adopted 407 for, 212 against, 60 abstained

    12:49

    Roll call requested by S&D

  14. Vote 19:Amendment 46 to paragraph 4 — part 1

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 4 – Am 46/1

    Adopted 432 for, 207 against, 19 abstained

    12:49

    Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by S&D

    ‘strongly condemns US threats against Greenland;’

  15. Vote 20:Amendment 46 to paragraph 4 — part 2

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 4 – Am 46/2

    Rejected 101 for, 550 against, 14 abstained

    12:50

    Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by S&D

    ‘is appalled by the apparent lack of condemnation by EU officials of such a blatant threat against the autonomous territory of a Member State;’

  16. Vote 23:Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 4

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 4 – Am 47

    Rejected 89 for, 561 against, 27 abstained

    12:50

    Roll call requested by The Left

  17. Vote 24:Amendment 48 to paragraph 5

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 5 – Am 48

    Rejected 102 for, 550 against, 22 abstained

    12:50

    Roll call requested by The Left

  18. Vote 25:Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 5

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 5 – Am 49

    Adopted 286 for, 261 against, 129 abstained

    12:50

    Roll call requested by The Left

  19. Vote 26:Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 5

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 5 – Am 50

    Rejected 118 for, 510 against, 52 abstained

    12:51

    Roll call requested by The Left

  20. Vote 28:Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 6

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 6 – Am 51

    Rejected 64 for, 572 against, 14 abstained

    12:53

    Roll call requested by The Left

  21. Vote 29:Amendment 4 to paragraph 7

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 7 – Am 4

    Rejected 239 for, 353 against, 80 abstained

    12:53

    Roll call requested by The Left

  22. Vote 32:Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 7

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 7 – Am 8

    Rejected 206 for, 447 against, 20 abstained

    12:54

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  23. Vote 35:Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 10

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 10 – Am 5

    Rejected 251 for, 309 against, 116 abstained

    12:54

    Roll call requested by The Left

  24. Vote 36:Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 11

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 11 – Am 6

    Rejected 83 for, 536 against, 48 abstained

    12:54

    Roll call requested by The Left

  25. Vote 42:Amendment 104 to paragraph 13

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 13 – Am 104

    Adopted 356 for, 229 against, 86 abstained

    12:55

    Roll call requested by ECR

  26. Vote 45:Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 14 – Am 52/1

    Rejected 216 for, 399 against, 48 abstained

    12:56

    Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by S&D

    The part voted on

    ‘Recalls the provisional measures ordered by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) regarding the application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel); stresses the need for international law to be upheld and respected; calls on the Council and the Commission to ensure that the EU is in no way complicit in violations of international law, including under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide,’

  27. Vote 46:Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 14 – Am 52/2

    Rejected 99 for, 538 against, 34 abstained

    12:56

    Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by S&D

    ‘with particular regard to the role of the European arms industry in providing weapons to the Israel Defense Forces;’

  28. Vote 47:Amendment 53 to paragraph 15

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 15 – Am 53

    Rejected 205 for, 395 against, 69 abstained

    12:56

    Roll call requested by The Left

  29. Vote 52:Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 15

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 15 – Am 54

    Rejected 215 for, 391 against, 70 abstained

    12:57

    Roll call requested by The Left

  30. Vote 53:Amendment 106, adding text after paragraph 16 — part 1

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 16 – Am 106/1

    Adopted 425 for, 189 against, 60 abstained

    12:57

    Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by S&D

    ‘Emphasises the importance of ensuring a geographically balanced distribution of defence financing in the next multiannual financial framework (MFF),’

  31. Vote 54:Amendment 106, adding text after paragraph 16 — part 2

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 16 – Am 106/2

    Rejected 278 for, 357 against, 40 abstained

    12:57

    Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by S&D

    ‘particularly to strengthen the EU’s external borders with Russia and Belarus;’

  32. Vote 56:Amendment 107, adding text after paragraph 17 — part 1

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 17 – Am 107/1

    Adopted 439 for, 163 against, 72 abstained

    12:57

    Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by S&D

    The part voted on

    ‘Calls for urgent financial support to ensure the timely supply of defence products through joint procurement, industrial coordination, stockpiling, access to finance for manufacturers and the expansion and modernisation of production capacities,’

  33. Vote 57:Amendment 107, adding text after paragraph 17 — part 2

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 17 – Am 107/2

    Rejected 314 for, 322 against, 32 abstained

    12:58

    Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by S&D

    The part voted on

    ‘emphasising that this funding should prioritise Member States bordering Ukraine, to enhance its protection, and Member States bordering Russia, to further deter potential threats;’

  34. Vote 65:Amendment 55 to paragraph 20

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 20 – Am 55

    Adopted 379 for, 270 against, 26 abstained

    12:59

    Roll call requested by The Left

  35. Vote 66:Amendment 56, adding text after paragraph 22

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 22 – Am 56

    Rejected 91 for, 501 against, 85 abstained

    12:59

    Roll call requested by The Left

  36. Vote 67:Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 22

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 22 – Am 57

    Rejected 77 for, 510 against, 71 abstained

    12:59

    Roll call requested by The Left

  37. Vote 68:Amendment 84, adding text after paragraph 22

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 22 – Am 84

    Adopted 457 for, 172 against, 45 abstained

    12:59

    Roll call requested by S&D

  38. Vote 69:Amendment 105, adding text after paragraph 22

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 22 – Am 105

    Adopted 523 for, 76 against, 72 abstained

    12:59

    Roll call requested by ECR

  39. Vote 73:Amendment 10 to paragraph 32

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 32 – Am 10

    Rejected 219 for, 445 against, 15 abstained

    13:00

    Roll call requested by Greens

  40. Vote 76:Amendment 59, adding text after paragraph 32

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 32 – Am 59

    Adopted 485 for, 129 against, 55 abstained

    13:00

    Roll call requested by The Left

  41. Vote 79:Amendment 100 to paragraph 34

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 34 – Am 100

    Rejected 281 for, 318 against, 78 abstained

    13:01

    Roll call requested by ECR

  42. Vote 83:Amendment 11 to paragraph 37

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 37 – Am 11

    Rejected 236 for, 427 against, 16 abstained

    13:01

    Roll call requested by Greens

  43. Vote 84:Amendment 101 to paragraph 39

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 39 – Am 101

    Rejected 159 for, 442 against, 73 abstained

    13:01

    Roll call requested by ECR

  44. Vote 88:Amendment 103 to paragraph 46 — part 1

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 46 – Am 103/1

    Adopted 478 for, 102 against, 94 abstained

    13:02

    Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by S&D

    ‘calls for a more geographically balanced development of the EDTIB,’

  45. Vote 89:Amendment 103 to paragraph 46 — part 2

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 46 – Am 103/2

    Adopted 316 for, 281 against, 58 abstained

    13:02

    Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by S&D

    The part voted on

    ‘ensuring that critical capabilities, such as ammunition production, air defence systems and drone technologies, are also developed in frontline states, which have a direct understanding of operational needs;’

  46. Vote 92:Amendment 96, adding text after paragraph 47

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 47 – Am 96

    Rejected 203 for, 448 against, 13 abstained

    13:02

    Roll call requested by ESN

  47. Vote 93:Amendment 97, adding text after paragraph 47

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 47 – Am 97

    Rejected 203 for, 456 against, 18 abstained

    13:03

    Roll call requested by ESN

  48. Vote 94:Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 48

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 48 – Am 9

    Rejected 188 for, 473 against, 20 abstained

    13:03

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  49. Vote 101:Amendment 61 to paragraph 54

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 54 – Am 61

    Rejected 176 for, 459 against, 25 abstained

    13:04

  50. Vote 102:Amendment 98, adding text after paragraph 55

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 55 – Am 98

    Rejected 92 for, 541 against, 40 abstained

    13:04

    Roll call requested by ESN

  51. Vote 103:Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 56

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 56 – Am 12

    Rejected 209 for, 283 against, 180 abstained

    13:05

    Roll call requested by Greens

  52. Vote 105:Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 57

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 57 – Am 13

    Rejected 191 for, 445 against, 31 abstained

    13:05

    Roll call requested by Greens

  53. Vote 106:Amendment 62 to paragraph 58

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 58 – Am 62

    Rejected 258 for, 383 against, 35 abstained

    13:05

    Roll call requested by The Left

  54. Vote 114:Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 58

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 58 – Am 65

    Rejected 62 for, 588 against, 29 abstained

    13:06

    Roll call requested by The Left

  55. Vote 120:Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 61

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 61 – Am 67

    Rejected 64 for, 514 against, 93 abstained

    13:07

    Roll call requested by The Left

  56. Vote 121:Amendment 66 to paragraph 62 — part 1

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 62 – Am 66/1

    Rejected 122 for, 502 against, 47 abstained

    13:07

    Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by S&D

    ‘calls, therefore, on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that EU public spending goes to EU companies, and EU companies only;’

  57. Vote 122:Amendment 66 to paragraph 62 — part 2

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 62 – Am 66/2

    Rejected 227 for, 425 against, 21 abstained

    13:07

    Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by S&D

    ‘stresses that the licensed production of US weapons should not be counted as European production, eligible for EU spending;’

  58. Vote 124:Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 63

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 63 – Am 68

    Rejected 65 for, 571 against, 35 abstained

    13:08

    Roll call requested by The Left

  59. Vote 125:Amendment 69, adding text after paragraph 63

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 63 – Am 69

    Rejected 52 for, 566 against, 43 abstained

    13:08

    Roll call requested by The Left

  60. Vote 126:Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 63

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 63 – Am 70

    Rejected 54 for, 569 against, 44 abstained

    13:08

    Roll call requested by The Left

  61. Vote 127:Amendment 71, adding text after paragraph 64

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 64 – Am 71

    Rejected 102 for, 528 against, 46 abstained

    13:08

    Roll call requested by The Left

  62. Vote 128:Amendment 85, adding text after paragraph 66

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 66 – Am 85

    Rejected 200 for, 425 against, 53 abstained

    13:08

    Roll call requested by S&D

  63. Vote 129:Amendment 14 to paragraph 68

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 68 – Am 14

    Rejected 231 for, 390 against, 53 abstained

    13:09

    Roll call requested by Greens

  64. Vote 131:Amendment 108 to paragraph 68

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 68 – Am 108

    Rejected 97 for, 517 against, 56 abstained

    13:09

    Roll call requested by ECR

  65. Vote 133:Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 68

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 68 – Am 15

    Rejected 198 for, 459 against, 14 abstained

    13:09

    Roll call requested by Greens

  66. Vote 134:Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 68

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 68 – Am 16

    Rejected 208 for, 400 against, 70 abstained

    13:09

    Roll call requested by Greens

  67. Vote 142:Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 69

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 69 – Am 17

    Rejected 216 for, 438 against, 25 abstained

    13:11

    Roll call requested by Greens

  68. Vote 143:Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 69

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 69 – Am 18

    Rejected 303 for, 316 against, 62 abstained

    13:11

    Roll call requested by Greens

  69. Vote 147:Amendment 76 to paragraph 71 — part 1

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 71 – Am 76/1

    Rejected 267 for, 280 against, 119 abstained

    13:12

    Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by S&D

    The part voted on

    ‘reiterates the need to protect welfare services and social investments while investing in defence; recognises the importance of well-funded social welfare services in maintaining overall national resilience;’

  70. Vote 148:Amendment 76 to paragraph 71 — part 2

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 71 – Am 76/2

    Rejected 217 for, 422 against, 29 abstained

    13:12

    Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by S&D

    The part voted on

    ‘reminds the Member States, to this end, of the importance of progressive taxation of capital gains and high incomes as important sources of funding for both the reconstruction of national defence capabilities and comprehensive welfare services;’

  71. Vote 154:Amendment 19 to paragraph 74

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 74 – Am 19

    Rejected 181 for, 384 against, 112 abstained

    13:13

    Roll call requested by Greens

  72. Vote 157:Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 74

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 74 – Am 77

    Rejected 190 for, 444 against, 44 abstained

    13:13

    Roll call requested by The Left

  73. Vote 158:Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 74

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 74 – Am 78

    Rejected 61 for, 572 against, 41 abstained

    13:14

    Roll call requested by The Left

  74. Vote 165:Amendment 99 to recital A

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – recital A – Am 99

    Adopted 494 for, 114 against, 70 abstained

    13:15

    Roll call requested by ECR

  75. Vote 168:Amendment 22, adding text after recital E

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After recital E – Am 22

    Rejected 106 for, 524 against, 49 abstained

    13:16

    Roll call requested by The Left

  76. Vote 170:Amendment 24, adding text after recital E

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After recital E – Am 24

    Rejected 279 for, 301 against, 94 abstained

    13:16

    Roll call requested by The Left

  77. Vote 171:Amendment 25, adding text after recital J

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After recital J – Am 25

    Adopted 365 for, 234 against, 79 abstained

    13:16

    Roll call requested by The Left

  78. Vote 179:Amendment 32, adding text after recital P

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After recital P – Am 32

    Rejected 118 for, 526 against, 36 abstained

    13:17

    Roll call requested by The Left

  79. Vote 185:Amendment 1, adding text after recital T

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After recital T – Am 1

    Rejected 78 for, 515 against, 87 abstained

    13:17

    Roll call requested by The Left

· 106

106 votes on parts of the text: 64 adopted, 30 rejected, 12 lapsed or other

  1. Vote 9:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 2

    Rejected show of hands

  2. Vote 14:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 2

    Rejected show of hands

  3. Vote 15:Paragraph 3 — part 1 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ECR

    ‘Stresses that Europe continues to stand firmly on the side of Ukraine as it courageously fights for our European values,’

  4. Vote 16:Paragraph 3 — part 2 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ECR

    ‘and recalls its conviction that it is on the Ukrainian battlefields that the future of Europe will be decided;’

  5. Vote 17:Paragraph 3 — part 3 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ECR

    ‘strongly believes that Europe is today facing the most profound military threat to its territorial integrity since the end of the Cold War;’

  6. Vote 21:Paragraph 4 — part 1 of 2

    Lapsed no count

    Split vote by ECR

    The part voted on

    ‘Believes that Russia, supported by its allies including Belarus, China, North Korea and Iran, is the most significant direct and indirect threat to the EU and its security, as well as that of EU candidate countries and partners; reiterates its condemnation, in the strongest possible terms, of Russia’s unprovoked, illegal and unjustified war of aggression against Ukraine;’

  7. Vote 22:Paragraph 4 — part 2 of 2

    Lapsed show of hands

    Split vote by ECR

    The part voted on

    ‘notes, however, the need to consider fully the instability in our southern neighbourhood, the rise in Chinese military power and the increased aggressiveness of the middle powers, which appear ready to jeopardise transatlantic cooperation on common security and make a deal with the Russian aggressor at the expense of Ukrainian and European security, which are one and the same; notes that the recent actions and statements of the US administration have further increased concerns about the future stance of the US vis-à-vis Russia, NATO and the security of Europe; regrets, in this regard, the votes of the US Government, aligned with the Russian Government, in the UN General Assembly and the UN Security Council on resolutions about the third anniversary of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine;’

  8. Vote 27:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 5

    Adopted 358 for, 270 against, 31 abstained

  9. Vote 30:Separate vote on paragraph 7

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ECR

  10. Vote 31:Paragraph 7 — part 2

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 7/2

    Adopted 420 for, 222 against, 32 abstained

    12:54

    Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR

    those words

  11. Vote 33:Paragraph 8 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ECR

    The part voted on

    ‘Deplores the reluctance of the Council and the EU Member States when it comes to addressing deep structural challenges of the European defence industrial landscape and the lack of ambition as regards cooperation at EU level between the Member States’ armed forces;’

  12. Vote 34:Paragraph 8 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ECR

    ‘calls on the Member States to join forces and support a major step towards a very ambitious and comprehensive framework on defence;’

  13. Vote 37:Separate vote on paragraph 12

    Adopted 448 for, 150 against, 70 abstained

    Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by The Left

  14. Vote 38:Separate vote on paragraph 12

    Adopted show of hands

    Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by The Left

  15. Vote 39:Separate vote on paragraph 12

    Lapsed no count

    Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by The Left

  16. Vote 40:Separate vote on paragraph 12

    Lapsed no count

    Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by The Left

  17. Vote 41:Separate vote on paragraph 13

    Rejected 188 for, 437 against, 48 abstained

    Split vote by The Left

  18. Vote 43:Separate vote on paragraph 13

    Lapsed show of hands

    Split vote by The Left

  19. Vote 44:Separate vote on paragraph 13

    Lapsed show of hands

    Split vote by The Left

  20. Vote 48:Paragraph 15 — part 1

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 15/1

    Adopted 475 for, 138 against, 63 abstained

    12:56

    Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by The Left, Patriots, ECR

    The part voted on

    ‘Urges the EU and its Member States to stand firmly on the side of Ukraine; recalls its conviction that it is on the Ukrainian battlefields that the future of Europe will be decided and that the trajectory of Russia’s war against Ukraine will be decisively shifted; underlines that such a shift now depends almost entirely on Europe;’

  21. Vote 49:Paragraph 15 — part 2

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 15/2

    Adopted 448 for, 159 against, 65 abstained

    12:56

    Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by The Left, Patriots, ECR

    The part voted on

    ‘urges the Member States, therefore, to provide more arms and ammunition to Ukraine before negotiations are concluded; warns that, if the EU were to fail in its support and Ukraine were forced to surrender, Russia would then turn against other countries, including possibly the EU Member States;’

  22. Vote 50:Paragraph 15 — part 3

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 15/3

    Adopted 422 for, 183 against, 57 abstained

    12:56

    Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by The Left, Patriots, ECR

    The part voted on

    ‘calls on the EU Member States, international partners and NATO allies to lift all restrictions on the use of Western weapons systems delivered to Ukraine against military targets in Russian territory;’

  23. Vote 51:Paragraph 15 — part 4

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 15/4

    Adopted 584 for, 51 against, 22 abstained

    12:57

    Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by The Left, Patriots, ECR

    The part voted on

    ‘calls for the EU and its Member States to actively work towards maintaining and achieving the broadest possible international support for Ukraine and identifying a peaceful solution to the war that must be based on full respect for Ukraine’s independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity, the principles of international law, accountability for war crimes and the crime of aggression, and Russian payments for the massive damage caused in Ukraine; urges the EU and its Member States to participate in establishing robust future security guarantees for Ukraine;’

  24. Vote 55:Separate vote on paragraph 17

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by Patriots

  25. Vote 58:Paragraph 18 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP

    ‘Praises the ‘Danish model’ for support for Ukraine, which consists of procuring defence capabilities produced directly in Ukraine;’

  26. Vote 59:Paragraph 18 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP

    The part voted on

    ‘urges the EU and its Member States to strongly support this model and to make full use of its potential, as there is an underutilisation of Ukraine’s defence industrial capacity, estimated at around 50 %, and it brings many advantages to both sides, such as cheaper equipment, speedier and safer logistics, and greater ease of training and maintenance;’

  27. Vote 60:Separate vote on paragraph 19

    Rejected show of hands

    Roll call requested by Renew, EPP · split vote by EPP, Patriots · separate vote by ECR

  28. Vote 61:Paragraph 19 — part 1

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 19/1

    Adopted 452 for, 123 against, 107 abstained

    12:58

    Roll call requested by Renew, EPP · split vote by EPP, Patriots · separate vote by ECR

    The part voted on

    ‘Calls for a significant increase in the financing of military support for Ukraine; calls, in this regard, for the swift adoption of the next military aid package, which should be the largest to date and reflect the level of ambition this juncture calls for;’

  29. Vote 62:Paragraph 19 — part 2

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 19/2

    Adopted 409 for, 208 against, 52 abstained

    12:58

    Roll call requested by Renew, EPP · split vote by EPP, Patriots · separate vote by ECR

    ‘calls on the EU Member States to commit at least 0.25 % of their GDP to military aid for Ukraine;’

  30. Vote 63:Paragraph 19 — part 3

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 19/3

    Adopted 466 for, 142 against, 62 abstained

    12:58

    Roll call requested by Renew, EPP · split vote by EPP, Patriots · separate vote by ECR

    ‘condemns the veto imposed by one Member State on the functioning of the European Peace Facility;’

  31. Vote 64:Paragraph 19 — part 4

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 19/4

    Adopted 469 for, 132 against, 69 abstained

    12:59

    Roll call requested by Renew, EPP · split vote by EPP, Patriots · separate vote by ECR

    The part voted on

    ‘calls on the EU Member States, together with their G7 partners, to immediately use all frozen Russian assets to serve as a foundation for a substantial grant and loan to Ukraine, as a legally sound and financially significant way to maintain and increase our support for Ukraine’s military needs;’

  32. Vote 70:Separate vote on paragraph 29

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by The Left, Patriots

  33. Vote 71:Paragraph 29 — part 2

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 29/2

    Adopted 567 for, 27 against, 75 abstained

    13:00

    Split vote by The Left, Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘reiterates its call for the protection of critical underwater infrastructure via the establishment of EU-specific rapid response strategies for underwater infrastructure protection, operating in alignment with NATO; encourages investment in advanced detection and surveillance systems for underwater infrastructure monitoring;’ without the words: ‘operating in alignment with NATO’

  34. Vote 72:Paragraph 29 — part 3

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 29/3

    Adopted 528 for, 63 against, 85 abstained

    13:00

    Split vote by The Left, Patriots

    ‘operating in alignment with NATO’

  35. Vote 74:Paragraph 32 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘Insists that the Rapid Deployment Capacity must achieve full operational capability in 2025 and should be upgraded to be able to face the most extreme military contingencies;’

  36. Vote 75:Paragraph 32 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘reiterates its call to strengthen the EU’s Military Planning and Conduct Capability (MPCC), establishing it as the preferred command and control structure for EU military operations and providing it with adequate premises, staff and effective communication and information systems for all CSDP missions and operations, including those of the Rapid Deployment Capacity;’

  37. Vote 77:Separate vote on paragraph 33

    Rejected show of hands

    Roll call requested by EPP

  38. Vote 78:Separate vote on paragraph 33

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 33

    Adopted 581 for, 41 against, 57 abstained

    13:01

    Roll call requested by EPP

  39. Vote 80:Paragraph 34 — part 1 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘Reiterates the importance of EU-NATO cooperation, as NATO remains, for those states that are members of it, an important pillar of their collective defence; stresses that EU-NATO cooperation should continue, in particular, in areas such as information exchange, planning, military mobility and the exchange of best practice, and to reinforce deterrence, collective defence and interoperability;’

  40. Vote 81:Paragraph 34 — part 2 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    ‘calls, nonetheless, for the development of a fully capable European pillar of NATO able to act autonomously whenever necessary;’

  41. Vote 82:Paragraph 34 — part 3 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    ‘reiterates its call to strengthen cooperation – through action, not only words – on military mobility, information exchange, coordination of planning, improved cooperation on their respective military operations and enhanced response to hybrid warfare aimed at destabilising the whole EU continent;’

  42. Vote 85:Paragraph 44 — part 1

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 44/1

    Adopted 561 for, 76 against, 41 abstained

    13:02

    Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by The Left

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘stresses that this must be done in cooperation with NATO by drafting a strategic plan for developing mobility;’

  43. Vote 86:Paragraph 44 — part 2

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 44/2

    Adopted 513 for, 122 against, 32 abstained

    13:02

    Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by The Left

    those words

  44. Vote 87:Separate vote on paragraph 46

    Rejected show of hands

    Split vote by ECR

  45. Vote 90:Separate vote on paragraph 46

    Lapsed show of hands

    Split vote by ECR

  46. Vote 91:Separate vote on paragraph 46

    Lapsed show of hands

    Split vote by ECR

  47. Vote 95:Separate vote on paragraph 49

    Rejected 235 for, 409 against, 35 abstained

  48. Vote 96:Separate vote on paragraph 50

    Adopted 330 for, 298 against, 42 abstained

  49. Vote 97:Separate vote on paragraph 52

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 52

    Adopted 439 for, 136 against, 96 abstained

    13:04

    Roll call requested by Greens

  50. Vote 98:Separate vote on paragraph 53

    Adopted 407 for, 238 against, 20 abstained

    Split vote by ECR

  51. Vote 99:Separate vote on paragraph 53

    Lapsed show of hands

    Split vote by ECR

  52. Vote 100:Separate vote on paragraph 53

    Lapsed show of hands

    Split vote by ECR

  53. Vote 104:Separate vote on paragraph 57

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 57

    Adopted 466 for, 176 against, 36 abstained

    13:05

    Roll call requested by ECR

  54. Vote 107:Paragraph 58 — part 1 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP, The Left, Patriots, ECR

    The part voted on

    ‘Calls for greater coherence in governance as CSDP must become the key instrument of a powerful Europe; considers that this requires a real link in governance between the Member States, the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (VP/HR) and the Commissioners;’

  55. Vote 108:Paragraph 58 — part 2 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP, The Left, Patriots, ECR

    The part voted on

    ‘urges the Member States to overcome the complexity of decision-making processes in the governance of European defence; calls for the creation of a council of defence ministers’

  56. Vote 109:Paragraph 58 — part 3

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 58/3

    Adopted 373 for, 279 against, 24 abstained

    13:06

    Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by EPP, The Left, Patriots, ECR

    ‘and for the move from unanimity to qualified majority voting for decisions in the European Council, the Council of Ministers and EU agencies such as the EDA,’

  57. Vote 110:Paragraph 58 — part 4

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 58/4

    Adopted 467 for, 114 against, 77 abstained

    13:06

    Split vote by EPP, The Left, Patriots, ECR

    ‘excluding military operations with an executive mandate’

  58. Vote 111:Paragraph 58 — part 3 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP, The Left, Patriots, ECR

    ‘and for the move from unanimity to qualified majority voting for decisions in the European Council, the Council of Ministers and EU agencies such as the EDA,’

  59. Vote 112:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 58

    Rejected show of hands

  60. Vote 113:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 58

    Rejected show of hands

  61. Vote 115:Separate vote on paragraph 59

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 59

    Adopted 476 for, 184 against, 13 abstained

    13:06

    Roll call requested by Patriots · separate vote by ECR

  62. Vote 116:Paragraph 60 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ECR

    The part voted on

    ‘Stresses that the creation of a single European defence market is a priority, as the fragmentation and lack of competitiveness of the European industry have so far hampered the capacity of the EU to assume more responsibility as a security provider; recalls that the concept of a ‘defence market’ implies a full recognition of its specificity and an appropriate and coherent application of EU public policies;’

  63. Vote 117:Paragraph 60 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ECR

    The part voted on

    ‘recalls that European preference should be the aim of achieving this single ‘market’ by strictly linking territoriality and the added value generated in this territory;’

  64. Vote 118:Separate vote on paragraph 61

    Adopted 325 for, 299 against, 43 abstained

    Separate vote by ECR

  65. Vote 119:Separate vote on paragraph 61

    Lapsed show of hands

    Separate vote by ECR

  66. Vote 123:Separate vote on paragraph 62

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by ECR

  67. Vote 130:Separate vote on paragraph 68

    Rejected show of hands

    Roll call requested by ECR

  68. Vote 132:Separate vote on paragraph 68

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 68

    Adopted 480 for, 130 against, 67 abstained

    13:09

    Roll call requested by ECR

  69. Vote 135:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 68

    Rejected show of hands

  70. Vote 136:Paragraph 69 — part 1 of 3

    Rejected show of hands

    Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by EPP, ECR

    ‘Strongly supports the idea that EU Member States must increase their defence and security financing to new levels;’

  71. Vote 137:Paragraph 69 — part 2 of 3

    Rejected 250 for, 384 against, 43 abstained

    Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by EPP, ECR

    ‘notes that some Member States have already increased their defence spending to 5 % of GDP’

  72. Vote 138:Paragraph 69 — part 3 of 3

    Rejected 190 for, 441 against, 42 abstained

    Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by EPP, ECR

    The part voted on

    ‘and insists that the current security environment and the multiple, complex and evolving security threats require Member States to increase their defence spending to at least 3 % of GDP;’

  73. Vote 139:Paragraph 69 — part 1

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 69/1

    Adopted 528 for, 75 against, 67 abstained

    13:10

    Roll call requested by Patriots, ECR · split vote by EPP, ECR

    ‘Strongly supports the idea that EU Member States must increase their defence and security financing to new levels;’

  74. Vote 140:Paragraph 69 — part 2

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 69/2

    Adopted 355 for, 155 against, 159 abstained

    13:10

    Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by EPP, ECR

    ‘notes that some Member States have already increased their defence spending to 5 % of GDP’

  75. Vote 141:Paragraph 69 — part 3

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 69/3

    Rejected 305 for, 309 against, 53 abstained

    13:11

    Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by EPP, ECR

    The part voted on

    ‘and insists that the current security environment and the multiple, complex and evolving security threats require Member States to increase their defence spending to at least 3 % of GDP;’

  76. Vote 144:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 69

    Rejected show of hands

  77. Vote 145:Paragraph 70 — part 1

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 70/1

    Adopted 489 for, 127 against, 64 abstained

    13:11

    Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by EPP

    The part voted on

    ‘Welcomes the proposals made in the recent Niinistö report as regards the financing of European defence; supports the establishment of a defending Europe facility and a securing Europe facility; equally welcomes and supports the proposal to establish an investment guarantee programme based on the model of InvestEU with open architecture to trigger private sector investment’

  78. Vote 146:Paragraph 70 — part 2

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 70/2

    Adopted 363 for, 180 against, 126 abstained

    13:12

    Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by EPP

    ‘and to issue a ‘European preparedness bond standard’;’

  79. Vote 149:Paragraph 71 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP

    ‘Is of the opinion that national recovery and resilience plans should be amended to allow for new defence funding;’

  80. Vote 150:Paragraph 71 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP

    The part voted on

    ‘calls for these investments to also address vulnerabilities in both military capabilities and the social fabric, empowering us to fight all threats to our values, social model, security and defence;’

  81. Vote 151:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 72

    Rejected 316 for, 335 against, 20 abstained

  82. Vote 152:Paragraph 73 — part 1

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 73/1

    Adopted 400 for, 216 against, 58 abstained

    13:13

    Roll call requested by Patriots, Renew · split vote by Patriots, Renew · separate vote by EPP

    ‘Calls for a system of European defence bonds to be explored for financing large-scale military investments up front;’

  83. Vote 153:Separate vote on paragraph 73

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots, Renew · separate vote by EPP

  84. Vote 155:Paragraph 74 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘in line with the Commission’s ‘ReArm Europe’ plan’

  85. Vote 156:Paragraph 74 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP

    those words

  86. Vote 159:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 76

    Adopted 457 for, 132 against, 73 abstained

  87. Vote 160:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 76

    Rejected 273 for, 298 against, 96 abstained

  88. Vote 161:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 76

    Adopted 457 for, 122 against, 87 abstained

  89. Vote 162:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 76

    Adopted 468 for, 130 against, 66 abstained

  90. Vote 163:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 76

    Adopted 312 for, 282 against, 76 abstained

  91. Vote 164:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 76

    Adopted show of hands

  92. Vote 166:Vote on text inserted after recital B

    Rejected show of hands

  93. Vote 167:Vote on text inserted after recital C

    Rejected show of hands

  94. Vote 169:Vote on text inserted after recital E

    Rejected show of hands

  95. Vote 172:Vote on text inserted after recital N

    Rejected show of hands

  96. Vote 173:Vote on text inserted after recital N

    Rejected show of hands

  97. Vote 174:Vote on text inserted after recital N

    Lapsed show of hands

  98. Vote 175:Vote on text inserted after recital N

    Rejected show of hands

  99. Vote 176:Vote on text inserted after recital N

    Rejected show of hands

  100. Vote 177:Vote on text inserted after recital N

    Rejected show of hands

  101. Vote 178:Vote on text inserted after recital N

    Rejected show of hands

  102. Vote 180:Vote on text inserted after recital P

    Rejected show of hands

  103. Vote 181:Vote on text inserted after recital R

    Rejected show of hands

  104. Vote 182:Vote on text inserted after recital R

    Rejected show of hands

  105. Vote 183:Recital S — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP, The Left

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘by the requirement for unanimity’

  106. Vote 184:Recital S — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP, The Left

    those words

· 1

  1. Vote 186:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote

    RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

    Adopted 419 for, 204 against, 46 abstained

    13:18

    Roll call requested by Renew, EPP

Alternative motions · 8

  1. Vote 187:Alternative motion for a resolution

    B10-0144/2025

    Lapsed show of hands

  2. Vote 188:Alternative motion for a resolution

    B10-0145/2025

    Lapsed show of hands

  3. Vote 189:Alternative motion for a resolution

    B10-0146/2025

    Lapsed show of hands

  4. Vote 190:Alternative motion for a resolution

    B10-0147/2025

    Lapsed show of hands

  5. Vote 191:Alternative motion for a resolution

    B10-0148/2025

    Lapsed show of hands

  6. Vote 192:Alternative motion for a resolution

    B10-0149/2025

    Lapsed show of hands

  7. Vote 193:Alternative motion for a resolution

    B10-0150/2025

    Lapsed show of hands

  8. Vote 194:Alternative motion for a resolution

    B10-0151/2025

    Lapsed show of hands

← Back to the decision