Paragraph 69 — part 3
White paper on the future of European defence
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 69/3
Rejected
- For
- 305
- Against
- 309
- Abstained
- 53
roll-call vote at 13:11 · 46% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by EPP, ECR
The part voted on: ‘and insists that the current security environment and the multiple, complex and evolving security threats require Member States to increase their defence spending to at least 3 % of GDP;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 39 | 4 | 43 | Against |
| Greens | 29 | 13 | 7 | 49 | Divided |
| S&D | 16 | 101 | 15 | 132 | Against |
| Renew | 63 | 6 | 2 | 71 | For |
| EPP | 150 | 7 | 11 | 168 | For |
| ECR | 41 | 29 | 3 | 73 | Divided |
| Patriots | 0 | 74 | 8 | 82 | Against |
| ESN | 2 | 17 | 2 | 21 | Against |
| No group | 4 | 23 | 1 | 28 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
73 MEPs of 667 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.