Amendment 103 — part 2 to paragraph 46
White paper on the future of European defence
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 46 – Am 103/2
Adopted
- For
- 316
- Against
- 281
- Abstained
- 58
roll-call vote at 13:02 · 48% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by S&D
The part voted on: ‘ensuring that critical capabilities, such as ammunition production, air defence systems and drone technologies, are also developed in frontline states, which have a direct understanding of operational needs;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 4 | 37 | 0 | 41 | Against |
| Greens | 42 | 0 | 3 | 45 | For |
| S&D | 28 | 100 | 3 | 131 | Against |
| Renew | 7 | 64 | 0 | 71 | Against |
| EPP | 153 | 5 | 7 | 165 | For |
| ECR | 66 | 0 | 4 | 70 | For |
| Patriots | 13 | 54 | 16 | 83 | Divided |
| ESN | 0 | 2 | 19 | 21 | Abstained |
| No group | 3 | 19 | 6 | 28 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
83 MEPs of 655 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.