Paragraph 44 — part 1
White paper on the future of European defence
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 44/1
Adopted
- For
- 561
- Against
- 76
- Abstained
- 41
roll-call vote at 13:02 · 83% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by The Left
The part voted on: Text as a whole without the words: ‘stresses that this must be done in cooperation with NATO by drafting a strategic plan for developing mobility;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 13 | 17 | 13 | 43 | Divided |
| Greens | 50 | 0 | 1 | 51 | For |
| S&D | 130 | 3 | 0 | 133 | For |
| Renew | 69 | 2 | 0 | 71 | For |
| EPP | 174 | 1 | 1 | 176 | For |
| ECR | 67 | 1 | 5 | 73 | For |
| Patriots | 56 | 13 | 12 | 81 | For |
| ESN | 0 | 18 | 5 | 23 | Against |
| No group | 2 | 21 | 4 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
23 MEPs of 678 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.