Amendment 106 — part 1, after paragraph 16
White paper on the future of European defence
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 16 – Am 106/1
Adopted
- For
- 425
- Against
- 189
- Abstained
- 60
roll-call vote at 12:57 · 63% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by S&D
The part voted on: ‘Emphasises the importance of ensuring a geographically balanced distribution of defence financing in the next multiannual financial framework (MFF),’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 13 | 29 | 2 | 44 | Divided |
| Greens | 5 | 46 | 0 | 51 | Against |
| S&D | 126 | 3 | 1 | 130 | For |
| Renew | 3 | 65 | 0 | 68 | Against |
| EPP | 171 | 4 | 0 | 175 | For |
| ECR | 63 | 2 | 8 | 73 | For |
| Patriots | 35 | 10 | 36 | 81 | Divided |
| ESN | 3 | 18 | 3 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 6 | 12 | 10 | 28 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
44 MEPs of 674 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.