Amendment 16 — part 2 to paragraph 5
Recommendation on smoke- and aerosol-free environments
RC-B10-0173/2024 – § 5 – Am 16/2
Rejected
- For
- 149
- Against
- 403
- Abstained
- 26
roll-call vote at 12:29 · 26% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by EPP
The part voted on: ‘regrets that the lack of differentiation with regard to smoke-free environments gives the wrong signal, undermines the use of new and emerging products for those switching entirely away from cigarettes and perpetuates misconceptions about their relative risks, as the Commission was unable to support its proposal with conclusive scientific evidence regarding the impact of second-hand aerosols;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 35 | 0 | 35 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 51 | 0 | 51 | Against |
| S&D | 0 | 111 | 0 | 111 | Against |
| Renew | 0 | 55 | 7 | 62 | Against |
| EPP | 13 | 129 | 2 | 144 | Against |
| ECR | 48 | 2 | 14 | 64 | For |
| Patriots | 56 | 10 | 1 | 67 | For |
| ESN | 23 | 0 | 0 | 23 | For |
| No group | 9 | 10 | 2 | 21 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
62 MEPs of 578 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.