Amendment 16 — part 1 to paragraph 5
Recommendation on smoke- and aerosol-free environments
RC-B10-0173/2024 – § 5 – Am 16/1
Adopted
- For
- 286
- Against
- 280
- Abstained
- 18
roll-call vote at 12:29 · 49% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by EPP
The part voted on: ‘Regrets the fact that the Commission’s proposal does not clearly differentiate between the application of restrictions for traditional tobacco products and new and emerging products such as e-cigarettes, and does not apply a scientific evidence-based approach;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 35 | 0 | 35 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 51 | 0 | 51 | Against |
| S&D | 0 | 113 | 0 | 113 | Against |
| Renew | 6 | 50 | 6 | 62 | Against |
| EPP | 136 | 7 | 1 | 144 | For |
| ECR | 53 | 3 | 8 | 64 | For |
| Patriots | 59 | 10 | 0 | 69 | For |
| ESN | 23 | 0 | 0 | 23 | For |
| No group | 9 | 11 | 3 | 23 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
62 MEPs of 584 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.