Paragraph 27 — part 4
New allegations of Russian interference in the European Parliament, in the upcoming EU elections and the impact on the Union
RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 27/4
Adopted
- For
- 386
- Against
- 79
- Abstained
- 44
roll-call vote at 13:49 · 76% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR
The part voted on: ‘insists that labelling on platforms should go beyond identifying deep fakes to also establish positive labelling using tools created by the media sector, such as the Journalism Trust Initiative;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | Abstained |
| Greens | 23 | 0 | 0 | 23 | For |
| S&D | 44 | 0 | 0 | 44 | For |
| Renew | 34 | 0 | 0 | 34 | For |
| EPP | 77 | 0 | 1 | 78 | For |
| ECR | 1 | 18 | 1 | 20 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 11 | 7 | 18 | Divided |
| ESN | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | Against |
| No group | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
20 MEPs of 509 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.